Overall Grades
Overall grades include the usual metrics, as well as offensive-output and traditional plus/minus. Each positive or negative event has equal value. A point scored (goal or assist) has a value of 2. A positive plus/minus adds a positive event to the grade, a negative plus/minus rating removes a positive event from the overall grade.
#14 Tomas Plekanec, #13 Mike Cammalleri and recent-cut #63 Andreas Engqvist had the top even-strength grades during the preseason. Engqvist's 5on5 play was not the concern during the preseason, the issue was more with his penalty-killing and faceoff performance; he had the lowest short-handed risk/reward rating among players still with the Montreal.
#32 Travis Moen had the lowest grade among NHL players. Slightly lower than #46 Andrei Kostitsyn. #78 Olivier Archambault had the top grade among junior-age players, while the lowest grade of any player belonged to #43 Ian Shultz.
Of note: #11 Scott Gomez's grade improved 9 points compared to last year's regular season.
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT | ||
| WINS | 145 | 206 | 211 | 182 | 45 | 27 | 41 | 106 | 10 | 23 | 116 | 116 | 93 | 78 | 110 | 82 | 78 | 109 | 138 | 124 | 114 | 132 | 134 | 59 | 44 | 45 | WINS | 4238 |
| EVENTS | 206 | 287 | 292 | 283 | 76 | 47 | 67 | 155 | 15 | 46 | 173 | 190 | 144 | 113 | 161 | 121 | 127 | 172 | 219 | 173 | 175 | 211 | 211 | 83 | 75 | 74 | EVENTS | 6032 |
| GRADE | 70 | 72 | 72 | 64 | 59 | 57 | 61 | 68 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 61 | 65 | 69 | 68 | 68 | 61 | 63 | 63 | 72 | 65 | 63 | 64 | 71 | 59 | 61 | GRADE | 70 |
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT |
Overall Risk/Reward
A players risk/reward rating is a determination of the difference between the average number of "good plays" and "bad plays" a player makes. This rating does not take into account offensive output or traditional plus/minus. The number is broken down to represent the average difference ("good plays" minus "bad plays") for each minute of ice time. The higher the number, the more successful plays a player made. A player creates a high risk/reward rating by completing passes, winning puck-battles, winning races to loose pucks, successfully getting the puck deep into the opposition zone, etc. Any unsuccessful attempts at the previous examples results in a negative event or "bad play".
Scott Gomez had the best even-strength risk/reward rating of any player; slightly ahead of both #14 Tomas Plekanec and #13 Mike Cammalleri. The top risk/reward among junior-age players belonged to Michael Bournival. Bournival's rating was only surpassed by the aforementioned Gomez, Plekanec and Cammalleri. The lowest risk/reward among players still in Montreal belonged to #32 Travis Moen. The only other two roster players with risk/reward ratings under 1.00 are #72 Erik Cole, and #46 Andrei Kostitsyn.
The lowest risk/reward of any forward in camp was earned by #43 Ian Shultz. Shultz's r/r rating of 0.00 means that he produced the same amount of "bad plays" than "good plays" while on the ice at even-strength. The top rating among players sent to Hamilton belongs to #59 Brock Trotter; slightly ahead of #90 Philippe Lefebvre.
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT | ||
| POS | 145 | 206 | 211 | 182 | 45 | 27 | 41 | 106 | 10 | 23 | 116 | 116 | 93 | 78 | 110 | 82 | 78 | 109 | 138 | 124 | 114 | 132 | 134 | 59 | 44 | 45 | POS | 4238 |
| NEG | 61 | 81 | 81 | 101 | 31 | 20 | 26 | 49 | 5 | 23 | 57 | 74 | 51 | 35 | 51 | 39 | 49 | 63 | 81 | 49 | 61 | 79 | 77 | 24 | 31 | 29 | NEG | 1794 |
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT | ||
| MINUTES | 46 | 70 | 73 | 73 | 26 | 19 | 22 | 36 | 4 | 15 | 45 | 54 | 35 | 25 | 41 | 35 | 45 | 39 | 59 | 59 | 47 | 57 | 53 | 22 | 29 | 18 | MINUTES | 1697.68 |
| POS/MIN | 3.12 | 2.94 | 2.89 | 2.51 | 1.70 | 1.45 | 1.84 | 2.98 | 2.64 | 1.49 | 2.55 | 2.13 | 2.65 | 3.11 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 1.75 | 2.83 | 2.34 | 2.10 | 2.45 | 2.30 | 2.55 | 2.72 | 1.51 | 2.46 | POS/MIN | 2.50 |
| NEG/MIN | 1.31 | 1.15 | 1.11 | 1.39 | 1.17 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.49 | 1.25 | 1.36 | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.24 | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.64 | 1.37 | 0.83 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.47 | 1.11 | 1.06 | 1.59 | NEG/MIN | 1.06 |
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 4.43 | 4.09 | 3.99 | 3.90 | 2.88 | 2.52 | 3.01 | 4.35 | 3.96 | 2.97 | 3.81 | 3.49 | 4.11 | 4.50 | 3.91 | 3.43 | 2.85 | 4.47 | 3.71 | 2.93 | 3.76 | 3.67 | 4.02 | 3.83 | 2.58 | 4.05 | EVENTS/ MIN | 3.55 |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.81 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.12 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.67 | 1.60 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 0.77 | 1.20 | 1.71 | 1.43 | 1.22 | 0.65 | 1.19 | 0.97 | 1.27 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 1.08 | 1.62 | 0.45 | 0.88 | RISK/REWARD | 1.44 |
| 11 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 80 | 90 | TM TOT |
No comments:
Post a Comment