OVERALL GRADE
Beaulieu's grade was the product of some solid puck-movement in the offensive-zone while on the powerplay. Bournival's best work was in the offensive and neutral-zones, while Gallagher had a strong rating in the offensive-zone.
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| WINS | 30 | 54 | 39 | WINS |
| EVENTS | 41 | 73 | 46 | EVENTS |
| GRADE | 73 | 74 | 85 | GRADE |
| PLAYER | 10 | 12 | 28 |
OVERALL RISK/REWARD RATING
Beaulieu had an overall risk/reward rating of 3.18. His even-strength rating was actually 2.82. He engaged in 4.62 events per-minute of ice-time and had an overall ratio of 5.43 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. Keep in mind, most of Beaulieu's ice-time took place on the powerplay.
Bournival had an overall risk/reward rating of 1.29, and engaged in 3.05 events-per minute of ice-time. He also had an overall ratio of 2.45 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle.
Gallagher had an overall risk/reward rating of 1.57 an engaged in 3.62 events per-minute of ice-time. He had an overall ratio of 2.53 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle.
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| POS | 27 | 48 | 38 | POS |
| NEG | 11 | 19 | 7 | NEG |
| ratio | 2.45 | 2.53 | 5.43 | ratio |
| MIN/G | 12.45 | 18.5 | 9.75 | MIN/G |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | 19 | 10 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 2.17 | 2.59 | 3.90 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.88 | 1.03 | 0.72 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 3.05 | 3.62 | 4.62 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.29 | 1.57 | 3.18 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 | 12 | 28 |
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
All 3 prospects engaged in over 2 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
Bournival had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.40, to go along with an o-zone ratio of 1.50 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 2 of 4 offensive-zone puck-battles, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and completed 5 of 9 pass-attempts. He also lost 2 puck-races.
Gallagher had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.65, and an o-zone ratio of 1.86 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 2 of 3 o-zone puck-battles, and completed 6 of 10 pass-attempts. He also recovered 10 loose-pucks.
Beaulieu had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.44; thanks again to some substantial powerplay time. He also had an offensive-zone ratio of 3.33 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He recovered 7 loose-pucks and completed 9 of 11 o-zone pass-attempts.
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| OZ POS | 15 | 26 | 20 | OZ POS |
| OZ NEG | 10 | 14 | 6 | OZ NEG |
| ratio | 1.50 | 1.86 | 3.33 | ratio |
| MIN/G | 12.45 | 18.5 | 9.75 | MIN/G |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | 19 | 10 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.20 | 1.41 | 2.05 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.62 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 2.01 | 2.16 | 2.67 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.40 | 0.65 | 1.44 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 | 12 | 28 |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Beaulieu had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.92 and a d-zone ratio of 5.50 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 1 of his 2 puck-battles, and completed all 5 of his d-zone passes.
Bournival had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.32 and a d-zone ratio of 2.33 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 2 of 3 d-zone puck-battles, while completing 2 of 3 pass-attempts.
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| DZ POS | 7 | 11 | 11 | DZ POS |
| DZ NEG | 3 | 6 | 2 | DZ NEG |
| ratio | 2.33 | 1.83 | 5.50 | ratio |
| MIN/G | 12.45 | 18.5 | 9.75 | MIN/G |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | 19 | 10 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.56 | 0.59 | 1.13 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.21 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 0.80 | 0.92 | 1.33 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.92 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 | 12 | 28 |
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Bournival and Beaulieu had a perfect game in the neutral-zone.
Bournival had a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.40. He recovered 1 loose-puck and completed both of his attempted passes.
Beaulieu had a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.72. He recovered 1 loose-puck and completed both of his attempted passes.
Gallagher had a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.32, and a neutral-zone ratio of 2.20 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 2 of 4 neutral-zone puck-battles, while beating an opposition player 1on1 with 2 of his 3 attempts (dekes).
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| NZ POS | 5 | 11 | 7 | NZ POS |
| NZ NEG | 0 | 5 | 0 | NZ NEG |
| ratio | N/A | 2.20 | N/A | ratio |
| MIN/G | 12.45 | 18.5 | 9.75 | MIN/G |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | 19 | 10 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.72 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.00 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | 12 | 28 | ||
| EV/ MIN | 0.40 | 0.86 | 0.72 | EV/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.72 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 | 12 | 28 |
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD RATING
Bournival was not used on the powerplay.
Gallagher had a powerplay risk/reward rating of 1.78 to go along with a PP ratio of 2.33 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He won 1 of 2 puck-battles, recovered 3 loose-pucks and completed 4 of 6 PP pass-attempts.
Beaulieu had a powerplay risk/reward rating of 2.86 and a PP ratio of 3.14 successful plays for every 1 mistake or lost puck-battle. He recovered 4 loose-pucks and completed 8 of 10 PP passes. He was able to get 2 of his 4 shot attempts on net.
| 12 | 28 | ||
| POS | 14 | 22 | POS |
| NEG | 6 | 7 | NEG |
| RATIO | 2.33 | 3.14 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 4.5 | 5.25 | MIN/G |
| 12 | 28 | ||
| MINUTES | 5 | 5 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 3.11 | 4.19 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 1.33 | 1.33 | NEG/MIN |
| 12 | 28 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 4.44 | 5.52 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.78 | 2.86 | RISK/REWARD |
| 12 | 28 |
SHORT-HANDED RISK/REWARD RATING
Beaulieu was not used short-handed.
Bournival had a short-handed risk/reward rating of 0.83. He recovered 1 loose-puck while playing short-handed. Gallagher had a negative short-handed risk/reward. Expressed differently, this shows that Gallagher made less successful plays than unsuccessful plays while playing short-handed. He lost 2 SH puck-battles and failed with 1 of his attempts to clear the puck out of the defensive-zone.
| 10 | 12 | ||
| POS | 1 | 2 | POS |
| NEG | 0 | 6 | NEG |
| RATIO | n/a | 0.33 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 1.2 | 2 | MIN/G |
| 10 | 12 | ||
| MINUTES | 1 | 2 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.83 | 1.00 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.00 | 3.00 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | 12 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 0.83 | 4.00 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.83 | -2.00 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 | 12 |
No comments:
Post a Comment