This one-game scouting report is from a 5-2 win over the Sarnia Sting on January 27th, 2012. It's important to note that Ceci was matched up against highly-touted prospect Nail Yakupov the entire game.
OVERALL GRADE
Ceci had a well above-average overall grade of 81. His grade was helped by a goal and an assist during the game. Comparing Ceci's 1-game grade to defensive-prospects covered for the 2011 draft, Ceci's grade places him above such prospects as Connor Murphy, Oscar Klefbom, and Nathan Beaulieu. Keep in mind that this is only a 1-game grade, and as such should not be used to determine a player's ability long-term.
| 83 | ||
| WINS | 68 | WINS |
| EVENTS | 84 | EVENTS |
| GRADE | 81 | GRADE |
| PLAYER | 83 |
OVERALL RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci had a star-level overall risk/reward rating of 2.09. Risk/reward ratings above 2.00 are rare, and were produced by only 5 draft-eligible defensemen scouted for the 2011 NHL draft. Much of Ceci's best work was done in the offensive-zone while quarterbacking the powerplay, and in the defensive-zone while attempting to shut down Nail Yakupov.
| 83 | ||
| POS | 62 | POS |
| NEG | 16 | NEG |
| RATIO | 3.88 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 22 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 22 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 2.82 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.73 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 3.55 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 2.09 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci produced a well above-average offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.82. This is even more impressive considering that Ceci is a defenseman. He also had an incredible overall offensive-zone ratio of 3.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Much of his best work in the offensive-zone was done on the powerplay. That said, his even-strength offensive-zone ratio was an impressive 2.15. He recovered 4 loose-pucks in the offensive-zone, while completing 14 of 17 o-zone passes; he was 5 for 7 with his o-zone passes at even-strength. He was also able to get 3 of his 5 attempted shots through to the net.
| 83 | ||
| OZ POS | 26 | OZ POS |
| OZ NEG | 8 | OZ NEG |
| RATIO | 3.25 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 22 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 22 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.18 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.36 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.55 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.82 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci had an above-average, but not exceptional defensive-zone risk/reward raring of 0.95, and a superb d-zone ratio of 3.63 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His even-strength d-zone rating was a strong 1.12. He completed 9 of 10 d-zone pass-attempts, won all 4 of his d-zone puck-battles, and recovered 9 loose-pucks. He also blocked 2 shots, and intercepted 2 opposition passes. He completed only 2 of his 4 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke); one of those failed attempts resulted in a stripped-puck, and goal by Yakupov.
| 83 | ||
| DZ POS | 29 | DZ POS |
| DZ NEG | 8 | DZ NEG |
| RATIO | 3.63 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 22 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 22 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.32 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.36 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.68 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.95 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci had few neutral-zone events, which resulted in a relatively low n-zone risk/reward rating of 0.23. That said, he was perfect in the n-zone; producing 5 successful plays and zero unsuccessful plays. He competed all 3 of his n-zone pass-attempts.
| 83 | ||
| NZ POS | 5 | NZ POS |
| 0 | NZ NEG | |
| RATIO | n/a | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 22 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 22 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.23 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.00 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EV/ MIN | 0.23 | EV/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.23 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
SHORT-HANDED RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci produced only 2 short-handed events. Both of which were successful. He successfully dumped the puck out of the defensive-zone on one occasion, and successfully dumped the puck deep into the offensive-zone on another occasion.
| 83 | ||
| POS | 2 | POS |
| NEG | 0 | NEG |
| RATIO | N\A | GAMES |
| MIN/G | 1.5 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 2 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.33 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.00 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.33 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.33 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD RATING
Ceci was a huge presence for Ottawa on the powerplay. He had an impressive powerplay risk/reward rating of 3.71, and a PP ratio of 5.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He completed 90% of his o-zone passes, and was able to get 1 of his 2 shot-attempts through to the net.
| 83 | ||
| POS | 16 | POS |
| NEG | 3 | NEG |
| RATIO | 5.33 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 3.5 | MIN/G |
| 83 | ||
| MINUTES | 4 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 4.57 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.86 | NEG/MIN |
| 83 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 5.43 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 3.71 | RISK/REWARD |
| 83 |
No comments:
Post a Comment