OVERALL GRADE
It's also interesting to note that Yakupov's overall grade is better than any overall grade produced by Ryan Nugent-Hopkins last season. That said, it is nothing more than an interesting note, as 1-game grades cannot determine a player's long-term ability. Yakupov's grade was helped by 1 goal scored and a traditional plus/minus rating of plus-1.
| 10 | ||
| WINS | 44 | WINS |
| EVENTS | 59 | EVENTS |
| GRADE | 75 | GRADE |
| PLAYER | 10 |
OVERALL RISK/REWARD RATING
Yakupov produced an above-average overall risk/reward rating of 1.62, and an overall ratio of 2.80 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was done in the offensive-zone, while his lowest numbers were produced in the neutral-zone; not unusual for offensive-players who prefer to carry the puck into the offensive-zone rather than dump it in deep.
| 10 | ||
| POS | 42 | POS |
| NEG | 15 | NEG |
| RATIO | 2.80 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 16.71 | MIN/G |
| 10 | ||
| MINUTES | 17 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 2.51 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.90 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 3.41 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.62 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 |
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Yakupov had an above-average offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.96, and an incredible o-zone ratio of 5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. The low event total per-minute played, but high ratio shows that Yakupov played a passive-game, but was incredibly efficient when the puck was on his stick. He won both of his o-zone puck-battles, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and completed 12 of 15 o-zone pass-attempts.
| 10 | ||
| OZ POS | 20 | OZ POS |
| OZ NEG | 4 | OZ NEG |
| RATIO | 5.00 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 16.71 | MIN/G |
| 10 | ||
| MINUTES | 17 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.20 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.24 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.44 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.96 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Yakupov had a strong defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.42, and a solid d-zone ratio of 2.17 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 4 of 5 d-zone puck-battles, but was successful with only 3 of 6 pass-attempts.
| 10 | ||
| DZ POS | 13 | DZ POS |
| DZ NEG | 6 | DZ NEG |
| RATIO | 2.17 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 16.71 | MIN/G |
| 10 | ||
| MINUTES | 17 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.78 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.36 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.14 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.42 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 |
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
As mentioned earlier, Yakupov's tendency to carry the puck through the neutral-zone and into the offensive-zone hurt his n-zone rating. His rating is also hurt by his tendency to stretch the zone. This makes pass-receptions very difficult; often resulting in him not being able to control passes. His neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.06 is well below-average, while his ratio of 1.13 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play is also low.
| 10 | ||
| NZ POS | 9 | NZ POS |
| NZ NEG | 8 | NZ NEG |
| RATIO | 1.13 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 16.71 | MIN/G |
| 10 | ||
| MINUTES | 17 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.54 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.48 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | ||
| EV/ MIN | 1.02 | EV/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.06 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 |
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD RATING
Yakupov was covered closely by Ottawa while playing on the powerplay. As such, he had a disappointing powerplay risk/reward rating of 0.00, and a ratio of only 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was not able to complete any o-zone passes on the powerplay, and failed with his only attempt to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone.
| 10 | ||
| POS | 3 | POS |
| NEG | 3 | NEG |
| RATIO | 1 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 2.46 | MIN/G |
| 10 | ||
| MINUTES | 2 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.22 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 1.22 | NEG/MIN |
| 10 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 2.44 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.00 | RISK/REWARD |
| 10 |
No comments:
Post a Comment