REFERENCE POINTS
These averages have been calculated over hundreds of games and approximately 2000 individual scouting reports:
Average grade: 67
Average ratio: 2.03
Average risk/reward: 1.31
Average offensive-zone risk/reward: 0.30
Average defensive-zone risk/reward: 0.62
Average neutral-zone risk/reward: 0.30
OVERALL GRADE
Geoffrion had a slightly above-average grade of 68. His best work was produced in the defensive-zone; both at even-strength and on the penalty-kill. He had an even traditional plus/minus and 2 shots on net.
| 5 | ||
| WINS | 19 | WINS |
| EVENTS | 28 | EVENTS |
| GRADE | 68 | GRADE |
| PLAYER | 5 |
OVERALL RISK/REWARD RATING
Geoffrion had a below-average overall risk/reward, and an overall ratio of 1.89 successful plays for every unsuccessful play. He was involved in an unimpressive 2.20 events per-minute played. As already mentioned, his best work was produced short-handed.
| 5 | ||
| POS | 17 | POS |
| NEG | 9 | NEG |
| RATIO | 1.89 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 11.82 | MIN/G |
| 5 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.44 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.76 | NEG/MIN |
| 5 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 2.20 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.68 | RISK/REWARD |
| 5 |
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Geoffrion had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.00, and an o-zone ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won only 2 of 5 offensive-zone puck-battles, and completed only 2 of 4 o-zone pass-attempts. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with his only attempt to beat an opposing player 1on1 (deke).
| 5 | ||
| OZ POS | 6 | OZ POS |
| OZ NEG | 6 | OZ NEG |
| RATIO | 1.00 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 11.82 | MIN/G |
| 5 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.51 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.51 | NEG/MIN |
| 5 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.02 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.00 | RISK/REWARD |
| 5 |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Geoffrion's best work was produced in the defensive-zone. That said, his defensive-zone risk/reward was still low due to a significant lack of events. He produced a defensive-zone ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only defensive-zone puck-battle, completed his only d-zone pass-attempt, and recovered 1 loose-puck.
| 5 | ||
| DZ POS | 4 | DZ POS |
| DZ NEG | 1 | DZ NEG |
| RATIO | 4 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 11.82 | MIN/G |
| 5 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.34 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.08 | NEG/MIN |
| 5 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 0.42 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.25 | RISK/REWARD |
| 5 |
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING
Geoffrion had a below-average neutral-zone risk/reward of 0.17. Again, this was due to a lack of events. He also produced a neutral-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was successful with all 3 of his attempts to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone, and won 1 of his 2 n-zone puck-battles.
| 5 | ||
| NZ POS | 4 | NZ POS |
| NZ NEG | 2 | NZ NEG |
| RATIO | 2 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 11.82 | MIN/G |
| 5 | ||
| MINUTES | 12 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 0.34 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.17 | NEG/MIN |
| 5 | ||
| EV/ MIN | 0.51 | EV/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 0.17 | RISK/REWARD |
| 5 |
SHORT-HANDED RISK/REWARD RATING
Geoffrion had an impressive short-handed risk/reward rating of 1.13. This was the result of both a solid performance, and a significant increase in events. His short-handed ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play was equally impressive.
| POS | 4 | POS |
| NEG | 1 | NEG |
| RATIO | 4.00 | RATIO |
| MIN/G | 2.65 | MIN/G |
| 5 | ||
| MINUTES | 3 | MINUTES |
| POS/MIN | 1.51 | POS/MIN |
| NEG/MIN | 0.38 | NEG/MIN |
| 5 | ||
| EVENTS/ MIN | 1.89 | EVENTS/ MIN |
| RISK/REWARD | 1.13 | RISK/REWARD |
| 5 |
No comments:
Post a Comment