Simion is a 6'1", 187 lbs right-handed forward. He skates with a choppy stride, and finished the tournament with no points and a minus-2 traditional plus/minus. He showed a relatively-high hockey IQ; demonstrated by a high number of loose-puck recoveries. He enjoyed substantial powerplay time, and took a regular shift on the right-wing. He was the 35th ranked European skater on Central Scouting's mid-term rankings
Bertschy is a a 5'10", 170 lbs right-handed forward with a compact, and efficient skating stride. He was among Switzerland's scoring leaders in the tournament, with 2 goals and 2 assists in six games. He finished with an even traditional plus/minus, and had an impressive shooting percentage of 12.5%. He was the 40th ranked European skater on Central Scouting's mid-term rankings.
This one-game scouting report is from a 3-0 loss to Russia during a December 26th WJHC game. Keep in mind that this is simply a one-game scouting report.
#25 Simion
#28 Bertschy
OVERALL GRADE
Christoph Bertschy had an above-average overall grade of 73. His best work was produced in the offensive-zone while playing at even-strength. Dario Simion had a slightly below-average overall grade of 66. His best numbers were produced in the offensive-zone while on the powerplay.
25 | 28 | ||
WINS | 25 | 32 | WINS |
EVENTS | 38 | 44 | EVENTS |
GRADE | 66 | 73 | GRADE |
PLAYER | 25 | 28 |
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD
Bertschy had an even-strength risk/reward rating of 1.00, and an even-strength ratio of 2.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Simion had an even-strength risk/reward rating of 0.79, and an even-strength ratio of 1.85 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.
25 | 28 | ||
POS | 24 | 27 | POS |
NEG | 13 | 12 | NEG |
RATIO | 1.85 | 2.25 | RATIO |
MIN/G | 14 | 15 | MIN/G |
25 | 28 | ||
MINUTES | 14 | 15 | MINUTES |
POS/MIN | 1.71 | 1.80 | POS/MIN |
NEG/MIN | 0.93 | 0.80 | NEG/MIN |
25 | 28 | ||
EVENTS/ MIN | 2.64 | 2.60 | EVENTS/ MIN |
RISK/REWARD | 0.79 | 1.00 | RISK/REWARD |
25 | 28 |
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Thanks to their ability to recover loose-pucks in the offensive-zone, both players produced above-average offensive-zone risk/reward ratings. Simion had an o-zone rating of 0.57, and an o-zone ratio of 1.80 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 9 loose-pucks, but failed with 3 of his 5 o-zone pass-attempts, and all 4 of his attempts to beat opposition players 1on1 (deke). Bertschy had an o-zone rating of 0.53, and an o-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 7 loose-pucks and completed 2 of his 3 o-zone pass-attempts. He was also able to get 4 of his 7 attempted shots through to the net.
25 | 28 | ||
OZ POS | 18 | 16 | OZ POS |
OZ NEG | 10 | 8 | OZ NEG |
RATIO | 1.80 | 2.00 | RATIO |
MIN/G | 14 | 15 | MIN/G |
25 | 28 | ||
MINUTES | 14 | 15 | MINUTES |
POS/MIN | 1.29 | 1.07 | POS/MIN |
NEG/MIN | 0.71 | 0.53 | NEG/MIN |
25 | 28 | ||
EVENTS/ MIN | 2.00 | 1.60 | EVENTS/ MIN |
RISK/REWARD | 0.57 | 0.53 | RISK/REWARD |
25 | 28 |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Both players produced low defensive-zone risk/reward ratings. Bertschy had the better d-zone rating at 0.20, to go along with a solid d-zone ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He intercepted 1 opposition pass, and completed 1 of his 2 d-zone pass-attempts. Simion had few d-zone events which hurt his rating (0.07). That said, his d-zone ratio was solid at 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He intercepted 1 opposition pass, and completed 1 successful dump-out.
25 | 28 | ||
DZ POS | 2 | 5 | DZ POS |
DZ NEG | 1 | 2 | DZ NEG |
RATIO | 2.00 | 2.50 | RATIO |
MIN/G | 14 | 15 | MIN/G |
28 | |||
MINUTES | 14 | 15 | MINUTES |
POS/MIN | 0.14 | 0.33 | POS/MIN |
NEG/MIN | 0.07 | 0.13 | NEG/MIN |
25 | 28 | ||
EVENTS/ MIN | 0.21 | 0.47 | EVENTS/ MIN |
RISK/REWARD | 0.07 | 0.20 | RISK/REWARD |
25 | 28 |
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Simion had the better neutral-zone risk/reward. He completed 2 successful dump-ins, and completed 2 of 3 n-zone passes. His n-zone ratio was an equally impressive 4 successful plays to every 1 unsuccessful play. Bertschy was not as solid in the neutral-zone. He produced a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of only 0.07, to go along with a neutral-zone ratio of only 1.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 4 loose-pucks in the neutral-zone, but was unable to complete any neutral-zone passes, and failed with 1 of his 2 attempts to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone.
25 | 28 | ||
NZ POS | 4 | 5 | NZ POS |
NZ NEG | 1 | 4 | NZ NEG |
RATIO | 4.00 | 1.25 | RATIO |
MIN/G | 14 | 15 | MIN/G |
25 | 28 | ||
MINUTES | 14 | 15 | MINUTES |
POS/MIN | 0.29 | 0.33 | POS/MIN |
NEG/MIN | 0.07 | 0.27 | NEG/MIN |
25 | 28 | ||
EV/ MIN | 0.36 | 0.60 | EV/ MIN |
RISK/REWARD | 0.21 | 0.07 | RISK/REWARD |
25 | 28 |
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD
Simion had more powerplay success in this particular game, but Bertschy produced far better offensive-numbers during the tournament. Simion produced a PP rating of 2.00, and was successful with all of his powerplay events. He completed 2 PP passes in the offensive-zone, while recovering 1 loose puck. Bertschy had a disappointing PP rating of 0.33, and a PP ratio of 1.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.
25 | 28 | ||
POS | 6 | 5 | POS |
NEG | 0 | 4 | NEG |
RATIO | N/A | 1.25 | RATIO |
MIN/G | 3 | 3 | MIN/G |
25 | 28 | ||
MINUTES | 3 | 3 | MINUTES |
POS/MIN | 2.00 | 1.67 | POS/MIN |
NEG/MIN | 0.00 | 1.33 | NEG/MIN |
25 | 28 | ||
EVENTS/ MIN | 2.00 | 3.00 | EVENTS/ MIN |
RISK/REWARD | 2.00 | 0.33 | RISK/REWARD |
25 | 28 |
No comments:
Post a Comment