Keep in mind that this is only a 1-game scouting report, and as such should not be used to determine a player's long-term potential.
OVERALL GRADE
Culkin produced no offense in the game. He had a below-average grade of 64. His best work was done on the powerplay and in the defensive-zone.
7
| ||
WINS
|
45
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
70
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
64
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
7
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD
Culkin produced a below-average risk/reward rating of 0.89, and an even-strength ratio of 1.64 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. As mentioned earlier, he struggled in the o-zone at even-strength, but played well in the defensive-zone.
7
| ||
POS
|
36
|
POS
|
NEG
|
22
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.64
|
RATIO
|
MIN/G
|
15.8
|
MIN/G
|
7
| ||
MINUTES
|
16.00
|
MINUTES
|
POS/MIN
|
2.28
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.39
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
3.67
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
| RISK/REWARD |
0.89
| RISK/REWARD |
7
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Culkin produced a negative offensive-zone risk/reward rating, as such his ratio was a disappointing 0.83 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Expressed differently, this shows that at even-strength, Culkin made more unsuccessful plays than successful plays in the offensive-zone. He lost his only o-zone puck-battle, completed his only pass-attempt, but failed to hit the net with any of his 3 attempted shots; typical for defensemen his age.
7
| ||
OZ POS
|
5
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
6
|
OZ NEG
|
GAMES
|
0.83
|
GAMES
|
MIN/G
|
15.8
|
MIN/G
|
7
| ||
MINUTES
|
13.00
|
MINUTES
|
POS/MIN
|
0.38
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.46
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.84
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
-0.08
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Culkin produced a solid, but slightly below-average defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.76, and a d-zone ratio of 1.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 5 loose-pucks, but won only 2 of 6 d-zone puck-battles. He intercepted 3 passes, blocked 1 shot, but failed to complete any of his 3 attempted dump-outs. He was also successful with 11 of 16 defensive-zone pass-attempts.
7
| ||
DZ POS
|
27
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
15
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.67
|
RATIO
|
MIN/G
|
15.8
|
MIN/G
|
7
| ||
MINUTES
|
16
|
MINUTES
|
POS/MIN
|
1.71
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.95
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
2.66
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.76
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD
Culkin produced only 5 neutral-zone events during the entire game. He produced a risk/reward rating of 0.14, and an impressive n-zone ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He did not attempts any n-zone passes, but intercepted 2 opposition passes, and recovered 1 loose-puck.
7
| ||
NZ POS
|
4
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
1
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
4.00
|
RATIO
|
MIN/G
|
15.8
|
MIN/G
|
7
| ||
MINUTES
|
16
|
MINUTES
|
POS/MIN
|
0.25
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.06
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.32
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.19
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD
Culinpowerplay, and whenever Quebec was looking to create offense. He had an impressive powerplay risk/reward rating of 4.00, and a PP ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Unfortunately many of his PP events took place outside of the offensive-zone. St. John did an excellent job killing penalties, making it difficult for Quebec to set up in the offensive-zone. As such, only 2 of Culkin's 14 PP events took place in the offensive-zone.
7
| ||
POS
|
10
|
POS
|
NEG
|
4
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.5
|
RATIO
|
MIN/G
|
1.5
|
MIN/G
|
7
| ||
MINUTES
|
2
|
MINUTES
|
POS/MIN
|
6.67
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
2.67
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
9.33
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
4.00
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
No comments:
Post a Comment