#16 Radek Faksa is the CSB's 7th ranked North American skater. He's a 6'3", 202 lbs left-handed forward. He scored 29 goals and added 37 assists in 62 games with the OHL's Kitchener Rangers.
#19 Tomas Hertl is Central Scouting's 5th ranked European skater. He's a 6'2", 198 lbs left-handed forward. He has already played pro hockey in the Czech Republic, where he's scored 12 goals, and added 13 assists in 38 games.
#27 Tomas Hyka is a 5'11", 165 lbs right-handed shooting right winger. He scored 20 goals and 44 assists in 50 games with the Gatineau Olympiques of the QMJHL. He is the CSB's 45th ranked North American skater; up from 65 on the mid-term rankings.
OVERALL GRADE
All 3 players had above-average grades. Tomas Hertl earned the top overall grade among this group of prospects. Hertl's grade was helped out by his strong work in both the offensive and defensive-zones, as well as the fact that he had more powerplay ice-time than both Faksa and Hyka.
Faksa scored 1 goal, 4 shots on goal, and a traditional plus/minus of plus-1. Hertl scored 2 goals, had 4 shots on goal, and a plus-1 rating. Hyka had 2 assists, four shots on goal, and a plus-1 rating.
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
WINS
|
33
|
44
|
53
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
45
|
52
|
67
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
73
|
85
|
79
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
16
|
19
|
27
| |
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#16 Faksa had an even-strength risk/reward rating of 0.93, and an ES ratio of 1.6 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His rating was helped by his work in the offensive-zone, but hurt by his low passing percentage in the defensive-zone; something he also struggled with in the CHL Top Prospects game. He engaged in 4.04 even-strength events per-minute played.
#19 Hertl earned an above-average even-strength risk/reward rating of 1.85, and this group's top ratio at 3.88 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was done in the offensive-zone, and he engaged in 3.13 successful plays.
#27 Hyka had the top ES risk/reward at 1.94, and the second-best ratio at 2.21 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He showed the most confidence carrying the puck, and had impressive numbers in both the neutral and offensive-zones.
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS
|
24
|
31
|
42
|
POS
|
NEG
|
15
|
8
|
19
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.60
|
3.88
|
2.21
|
RATIO
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
2.48
|
2.49
|
3.55
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.55
|
0.64
|
1.61
|
NEG/MIN
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
4.04
|
3.13
|
5.16
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.93
|
1.85
|
1.94
|
RISK/REWARD
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#16 Faksa earned an impressive offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.24, and a ratio of 3 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 3 of 4 puck-battles, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 7 pass-attempts. He was successful with all 4 of his attempted shots on goal, and engaged in 2.48 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#19 Hertl had an equally impressive offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.37, and an incredible ratio of 4.4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won all 5 of his puck-battles, recovered 6 loose-pucks, and was successful with 4 of his 5 pass-attempts. He was able to get all 4 of his attempted shots through to the net, and he engaged in 2.17 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#27 Hyka earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.35, and an offensive-zone rati of 3.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play; impressive numbers. He won only 1 of his 3 puck-battles. But, he recovered 9 loose-pucks, and was successful with an incredible 7 of 8 offensive-zone pass-attempts. He was also successful with all 3 of his attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke), and engaged in 2.37 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
OZ POS
|
18
|
22
|
22
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
3
|
4.40
|
3.67
|
RATIO
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.86
|
1.77
|
1.86
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.62
|
0.40
|
0.51
|
NEG/MIN
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
2.48
|
2.17
|
2.37
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.24
|
1.37
|
1.35
|
RISK/REWARD
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#16 Faksa earned a disappointing defensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.31. He won 1 of his 2 puck-battles, and recovered 3 loose-pucks. He did not complete either of his 3 defensive-zone pass-attempts, and engaged in 0.93 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#19 Hertl had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.32, and an impressive d-zone ratio of 5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle and recovered 1 loose-puck. He completed his only pass-attempt, and engaged in 0.48 offensive-zone events per-minute played. His d-zone events were low for a centre, but understandable considering the relatively weak competition, and final score.
#27 Hyka earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.25, and a ratio of 1.75 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and completed 3 of his 4 passes. He intercepted 1 opposition pass, and engaged in 0.93 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
DZ POS
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
6
|
1
|
4
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
0.5
|
5.00
|
1.75
|
RATIO
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.31
|
0.40
|
0.59
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.62
|
0.08
|
0.34
|
NEG/MIN
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.93
|
0.48
|
0.93
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
-0.31
|
0.32
|
0.25
|
RISK/REWARD
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#27 Hyka carried the puck through the neutral-zone substantially more often than his draft-eligible teammates. As such, he had the group's top neutral-zone risk/reward rating. Hertl had the top ratio, while Faksa produced a neutral-zone ratio of only 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play.
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
NZ POS
|
3
|
4
|
13
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
3
|
2
|
9
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1
|
2.00
|
1.44
|
RATIO
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.31
|
0.32
|
1.10
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.31
|
0.16
|
0.76
|
NEG/MIN
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.62
|
0.48
|
1.86
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.00
|
0.16
|
0.34
|
RISK/REWARD
|
16
|
19
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
POWERPLAY RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#16 Faksa was not used on the powerplay.
#19 Hertl had a powerplay risk/reward rating of 0.00, and a ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was successful with 1 deflection (resulting in a goal), but failed with both of his attempted passes. He engaged in 7.55 powerplay events per-minute of powerplay ice-time.
#27 Hyka earned a powerplay risk/reward rating of 0.94, and a ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 1 loose-puck and was successful with 1 of his 2 passes. He engaged in 2.83 powerplay events per-minute of ice-time.
19
|
27
| ||
POS
|
2
|
2
|
POS
|
NEG
|
2
|
1
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.00
|
2.00
|
RATIO
|
19
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
3.77
|
1.89
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
3.77
|
0.94
|
NEG/MIN
|
19
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
7.55
|
2.83
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.00
|
0.94
|
RISK/REWARD
|
19
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
5 (E)
|
45
|
CSB RANK
|
SHORT-HANDED RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#16 Faksa had a short-handed rating of 1.89, and a ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only short-handed puck-battle, but was successful with his only attempt to dump the puck into the offensive-zone. He engaged in 5.66 short-handed events per minute of short-handed ice-time
#19 Hertl was successful with each of his 4 short-handed events. He intercepted 1 pass, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and successfully dumped the puck out of the defensive-zone on 1 occasion. He engaged in 3.77 short-handed events per-minute played.
16
|
19
| ||
POS
|
2
|
4
|
POS
|
NEG
|
1
|
0
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.00
|
N/A
|
RATIO
|
16
|
19
| ||
POS/MIN
|
3.77
|
3.77
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.89
|
0.00
|
NEG/MIN
|
16
|
19
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
5.66
|
3.77
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.89
|
3.77
|
RISK/REWARD
|
16
|
19
| ||
CSB RANK
|
7
|
5 (E)
|
CSB RANK
|
No comments:
Post a Comment