2012 NHL Draft: One-game Scouting Report from CHL Top Prospects Game (4 of 4)

 

These 1-game scouting reports are from the 2012 CHL Top Prospects game. The game took place on February 1st, 2012. Team Orr won the game on a last minute goal by Branden Trook; other goal-scorers included Dillon Fournier and Griffin Reinhart.

TEAM CHERRY

(FORWARDS)

#9 Andrew Ryan
#10 Dane Fox
#11 Mike Winther
#12 Tom Wilson
#16 Brendan Gaunce
#17 Tim Bozon
#19 Gemel Smith
#21 Scott Laughton
#28 Coda Gordon
#37 Daniil Zharkov
#40 Dominik Volek
#91 Martin Frk


OVERALL GRADE

The top overall grade among Team Cherry forwards belonged to #28 Coda Gordon and #91 Martin Frk (78). Frk is the CSB's 20th ranked North American skater, while Gordon is ranked 61st. Other skaters with above-average grades include #10 Dane Fox, and #11 Mike Winther

The lowest grades belonged to #16 Brendan Gaunce (52), and #37 Daniil Zharkov (59).

Central Scouting's final ranking of each player is included under their respective numbers. 

	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
WINS	22	57	23	20	25	33	36	20	32	26	26	40	WINS
EVENTS	34	80	33	30	48	55	60	29	41	44	39	51	EVENTS
GRADE	65	71	70	67	52	60	60	69	78	59	67	78	GRADE
PLAYER	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
CSB RANK	109	46	21	15	13	42	37	28	61	32	163	20	CSB RANK

EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO

The top even-strength risk/reward rating belonged to #10 Dane Fox.  Fox engaged in 2.79 events per-minute played, and his best work was done in both the offensive and defensive-zones. The next best rating was earned by #92 Martin Frk. Frk earned an impressive and significantly above-average rating of 1.92.

The lowest even-strength risk/reward rating was earned by #16 Brendan Gaunce

The top even-strength ratio was also earned by #91 Frk. Frk had a solid ES ratio of 2.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Other players with above-average ratios include #10 Fox, #12 Wilson, #21 Scott Laughton, and #28 Coda Gordon.

	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
POS	17	54	14	20	23	31	36	19	21	24	24	32	POS
NEG	12	24	10	9	21	24	24	8	10	18	14	12	NEG
RATIO	1.42	2.25	1.40	2.22	1.10	1.29	1.50	2.38	2.10	1.33	1.71	2.67	RATIO
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
POS/MIN	1.63	5.19	1.35	1.92	2.21	2.98	3.46	1.83	2.02	2.31	2.31	3.08	POS/MIN
NEG/MIN	1.15	2.31	0.96	0.87	2.02	2.31	2.31	0.77	0.96	1.73	1.35	1.15	NEG/MIN
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
EVENTS/ MIN	2.79	7.50	2.31	2.79	4.23	5.29	5.77	2.60	2.98	4.04	3.65	4.23	EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD	0.48	2.88	0.38	1.06	0.19	0.67	1.15	1.06	1.06	0.58	0.96	1.92	RISK/REWARD
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
CSB RANK	109	46	21	15	13	42	37	28	61	32	163	20	CSB RANK

OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO

 #9 Andrew Ryan earned a disappointing offensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.10, and an o-zone ratio of only 0.8 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Expressed more simply, this shots that Ryan made more unsuccessful plays than successful plays while in the offensive-zone.  He recovered 3 loose-pucks, but was unsuccessful with either of his 2 attempted passes. He engaged in 0.87 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#10 Dane Fox produced an impressive offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.44, and an o-zone ratio of 1.88 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.  He won 1 of 2 puck-battles, but recovered an impressive 15 loose-pucks. He was successful with only 6 of his 15 pass-attempts, and engaged in an impressive 4.71 offensive-zone events per-minute played. Fox's rating was the product of his ability to recover loose-pucks. Unfortunately once he had possession of the puck, he was more likely to lose possession than to maintain possession.

#11 Mike Winther earned an o-zone risk/reward rating of 0.48, and an offensive-zone ratio of 2.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 4 loose-pucks and was successful with 3 of his 4 o-zone passes. He  was able to get 1 of his 3 shot attempts through to the net, and he engaged in 1.25 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#12 Tom Wilson had an offensive-zone rating of -0.19, and an offensive-zone ratio of 0.60 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Wilson made more unsuccessful plays than successful plays in the offensive-zone. He recovered 1 loose-puck and was successful with only 1 of his 3 passes. He engaged in 0.77 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#16 Brendan Gaunce earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.10, and a o-zone ratio of 0.92 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He made more unsuccessful than successful plays while in the offensive-zone. He recovered 5 loose-pucks, but was successful with only 2 of his 7 o-zone passes. He failed with 2 of his 3 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke), and engaged in a substantial 2.21 events per-minute played.

#17 Tim Bozon had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.48, and an o-zone ratio of 1.31 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won both his o-zone puck-battles, recovered 11 loose-pucks, but was successful with only 3 of his 9 passes. He was able to get 2 of his 5 shot attempts on net, and he engaged in 3.56 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#19 Gemel Smith had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and a ratio of 1.27 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost both his o-zone puck-battles, and recovered 7 loose-pucks. He was successful with 5 of his 9 passes, but only 2 of his 6 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He engaged in 2.4 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#21 Scott Laughton earned an o-zone rating of 0.48, and an offensive-zone ratio of 3.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only o-zone puck-battle, recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with each of his 4 passes. He was unable to get his only attempted shot through to the net, and he engaged in 0.87 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#28 Coda Gordon had this group's second-best offensive-zone risk/reward. He had an o-zone rating of 0.77, and a ratio of 2.68 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.  He won 3 of 4 puck-battles, and recovered 4 loose-pucks. He was successful with 2 of his 3 passes, but only 1 of his 4 attempted dekes. He engaged in 1.73 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#37 Daniil Zharkov had an offensive-zone rating of -0.10, and a ratio of 0.89 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Simply put, he made more unsuccessful plays than successful plays while in the offensive-zone. He recovered 4 loose-pucks, but was successful with only 1 of his 3 attempted passes, and only 1 of his 4 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He engaged in 1.63 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#40 Dominik Volek earned an o-zone risk/reward rating of 0.67, and an o-zone ratio of 2.17 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 6 loose-pucks and was successful wtih 4 of his 7 offensive-zone passes. He was able to get 2 of his 3 shot attempts on net, and engaged in 1.83 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

#91 Martin Frk earned an offensive-zone rating of 0.48, and an offensive-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with 2 of his 3 o-zone pass-attempts. He intercepted 2 opposition passes, and was able to get his only attempted shot through to the net. He engaged in 1.44 offensive-zone events per-minute played.

	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
OZ POS	4	32	9	3	11	21	14	7	13	8	13	10	OZ POS
OZ NEG	5	17	4	5	12	16	11	2	5	9	6	5	OZ NEG
RATIO	0.80	1.88	2.25	0.60	0.92	1.31	1.27	3.50	2.60	0.89	2.17	2	RATIO
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
POS/MIN	0.38	3.08	0.87	0.29	1.06	2.02	1.35	0.67	1.25	0.77	1.25	0.96	POS/MIN
NEG/MIN	0.48	1.63	0.38	0.48	1.15	1.54	1.06	0.19	0.48	0.87	0.58	0.48	NEG/MIN
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
EVENTS/ MIN	0.87	4.71	1.25	0.77	2.21	3.56	2.40	0.87	1.73	1.63	1.83	1.44	EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD	-0.10	1.44	0.48	-0.19	-0.10	0.48	0.29	0.48	0.77	-0.10	0.67	0.48	RISK/REWARD
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
CSB RANK	109	46	21	15	13	42	37	28	61	32	163	20	CSB RANK

DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO

#9 Andrew Ryan earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and a d-zone ratio of 1.6 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.  He recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 5 d-zone passes. He engaged in 1.25 defensive-zone events per-minute played.

#10 Dane Fox had an impressive defensive-zone rating of 1.25, and a d-zone ratio of 4.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of his 3 d-zone puck-battles, recovered an impressive 8 loose-pucks, and was successful with 2 of his 3 passes. He completed 4 dump-outs, and engaged in 2.02 defensive-zone events per-minute played.

#11 Mike Winther earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.00, and a ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost both his d-zone puck-battles and recovered 2 loose-pucks. He engaged in 0.77 defensive-zone events per-minute played.

#12 Tom Wilson produced an impressive d-zone rating of 1.06, and an exceptional defensive-zone ratio of 4.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won all 4 of his puck-battles, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with 4 of his 6 passes. He also beat  2 separate opponents 1on1 (deke), and engaged in 1.63 d-zone events per-minute played.

#16 Brendan Gaunce had a d-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and a defensive-zone ratio of 1.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.  He won only 1 of 4 puck-battles, but recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with all 4 of his d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.44 defensive-zone events per-minute played.

#17 Tim Bozon earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and a d-zone ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was successful with 2 of his 3 passes. He engaged in 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.

#19 Gemel Smith produced a d-zone rating of 0.58, and a d-zone ratio of 1.6 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 4 of 5 puck-battles, recovered 6 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 4 passes. He blocked 1 pass, and engaged in 2.5 defensive-zone events per-minute played.

#21 Scott Laughton earned a d-zone rating of 0.38, and a defensive-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, and recovered 3 loose-pucks. He was successful with 1 of his 2 attempted dekes, and engaged in 1.15 d-zone events per-minute played.

#28 Coda Gordon had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.38, and a d-zone ratio of 3 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with both of his attempts to dump the puck out of the defensive-zone (without an icing). He engaged in 0.77 d-zone events per-minute played

#37 Daniil Zharkov earned a d-zone rating of 0.29, and a defensive-zone ratio of 1.6 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 2 loose-pucks, but was successful with only 3 of his 7 d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.25 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.

#40 Dominik Volek  had a disappointing defensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.10, and a ratio  of 0.87 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He made more unsuccessful plays than successful plays while in the defensive-zone. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with 1 of his 2 attempted passes. He failed to block 2 shots that either went through his legs or under his stick, and he engaged in 1.25 d-zone events per-minute played.

#91 Martin Frk earned this group's top defensive-zone risk/reward rating. He had a d-zone rating of 1.35, and an impressive defensive-zone ratio of 3.8 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only d-zone puck-battle, but recovered 10 loose-pucks, and was successful with 6 of 8 d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.83 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.

	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
DZ POS	8	17	4	14	9	5	16	8	6	8	6	19	DZ POS
DZ NEG	5	4	4	3	6	2	10	4	2	5	7	5	DZ NEG
RATIO	1.6	4.25	1	4.67	1.5	2.5	1.6	2	3	1.6	0.87	3.8	RATIO
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
POS/MIN	0.77	1.63	0.38	1.35	0.87	0.48	1.54	0.77	0.58	0.77	0.58	1.83	POS/MIN
NEG/MIN	0.48	0.38	0.38	0.29	0.58	0.19	0.96	0.38	0.19	0.48	0.67	0.48	NEG/MIN
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
EVENTS/ MIN	1.25	2.02	0.77	1.63	1.44	0.67	2.50	1.15	0.77	1.25	1.25	2.31	EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD	0.29	1.25	0.00	1.06	0.29	0.29	0.58	0.38	0.38	0.29	-0.10	1.35	RISK/REWARD
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
CSB RANK	109	46	21	15	13	42	37	28	61	32	163	20	CSB RANK

NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO

 The top neutral-zone risk/reward ratings belonged to #34 Zharkov, and #40 Volek. Volek recovered 2 loose-pucks, while Zharkov recovered 2 loose-pucks, and completed 2 passes.

The lowest n-zone rating was shared by #11 Winther, #17 Bozon, and #28 Gordon.

The most neutral-zone events were engaged in by #17 Bozon (1.06), and #37 Zharkov (1.15).

	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
NZ POS	5	5	1	3	3	5	6	4	2	8	5	3	NZ POS
NZ NEG	2	3	2	1	3	6	3	2	3	4	1	2	NZ NEG
RATIO	2.5	1.67	0.5	3	1	0.83	2	2	0.67	2	5	1.5	RATIO
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
POS/MIN	0.48	0.48	0.10	0.29	0.29	0.48	0.58	0.38	0.19	0.77	0.48	0.29	POS/MIN
NEG/MIN	0.19	0.29	0.19	0.10	0.29	0.58	0.29	0.19	0.29	0.38	0.10	0.19	NEG/MIN
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
EV/ MIN	0.67	0.77	0.29	0.38	0.58	1.06	0.87	0.58	0.48	1.15	0.58	0.48	EV/ MIN
RISK/REWARD	0.29	0.19	-0.10	0.19	0.00	-0.10	0.29	0.19	-0.10	0.38	0.38	0.10	RISK/REWARD
	9	10	11	12	16	17	19	21	28	37	40	91
CSB RANK	109	46	21	15	13	42	37	28	61	32	163	20	CSB RANK