TEAM ORR
(DEFENSEMEN)
#3 Dalton Thrower
#4 Matt Finn
#6 Gianluca Curcuruto
#8 Griffin Reinhart
#27 Adam Pelech
#51 Derrick Pouliot
Keep in mind, this is a one-game scouting report. As such, it is only meant to represent these players' play during this one game.
OVERALL GRADE
The top overall grade for Team Orr defensemen was shared by #27 Adam Pelech, and #51 Derrick Pouliot. Five of the six defensemen earned grades above 70, while the lowest grade belonged to #6 Gianluca Curcuruto.
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
WINS
|
51
|
56
|
41
|
62
|
36
|
89
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
73
|
78
|
60
|
85
|
47
|
116
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
70
|
72
|
68
|
73
|
77
|
77
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| |
CSB RANK
|
26
|
16
|
160
|
10
|
120
|
12
|
CSB RANK
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
The top even-strength risk/reward rating belonged to #51 Derrick Pouliot. Pouliot had a superstar-level even-strength rating of 2.83, and was involved in an incredible 5.61 events per-minute played. His best work was produced in the defensive-zone. No other d-man had a risk/reward rating above 1.89, and the lowest rating was earned by #3 Dalton Thrower.
The top even-strength ratio was earned by #27 Adam Pelech. Pelech made 3.09 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play while at even-strength. His ratio was only slightly better than #51 Pouliot, who made 3.04 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.
The lowest ratio belonged to #3 Thrower, as he made 2.18 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Keep in mind, although Thrower's ratio was the lowest of the group, it was still an above-average ratio.
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
POS
|
37
|
42
|
40
|
55
|
34
|
76
|
POS
|
NEG
|
17
|
16
|
17
|
21
|
11
|
25
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.18
|
2.63
|
2.35
|
2.62
|
3.09
|
3.04
|
RATIO
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
2.47
|
2.80
|
2.67
|
3.06
|
2.27
|
4.22
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.13
|
1.07
|
1.13
|
1.17
|
0.73
|
1.39
|
NEG/MIN
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
3.60
|
3.87
|
3.80
|
4.22
|
3.00
|
5.61
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.33
|
1.73
|
1.53
|
1.89
|
1.53
|
2.83
|
RISK/REWARD
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
CSB RANK
|
26
|
16
|
160
|
10
|
120
|
12
|
CSB RANK
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#3 Dalton Thrower had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.27, and an o-zone ratio of 1.8 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 5 pass-attempts. He was involved in 0.93 offensive-zone events per-minute played, and was successful with only 2 of his 6 attempts to get a shot through to the net.
#4 Matt Finn earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.27, and had an o-zone ratio of 2.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 1 of his 2 pass-attempts. He failed with 2 of his 3 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke), and was involved in 0.67 o-zone events per-minute played.
#6 Gianluca Curcuruto had an o-zone risk/reward rating of 0.20, and an offensive-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only o-zone puck-battle, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was able to get 1 of his 3 shot attempts through to the net. He was involved in 0.60 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#8 Griffin Reinhart earned an offensive-zone rating of 0.50, and an o-zone ratio of 2.8 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was able to get 3 of his 5 shot attempts through to the net, he won his only o-zone puck-battle, and was successful with 4 of his 6 pass-attempts. He was involved in 1.06 o-zone events per-minute played.
#27 Adam Pelech had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.20, and an o-zone ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was able to get his only attempted shot on net, while completing 1 pass, and winning 1 puck-battle. He was only involved in 0.33 o-zone events per-minute played, as he focused on playing sound defense.
#51 Derrick Pouliot earned this group's top offensive-zone risk/reward rating at 0.67. He also had the third-best o-zone ratio, as he made 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 7 loose-pucks, and was successful with 9 of his 11 pass-attempts. He was able to get only 2 of his 6 shots through to the net, and he engaged in 1.56 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
OZ POS
|
9
|
7
|
6
|
14
|
4
|
20
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
8
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.80
|
2.33
|
2.00
|
2.80
|
4.00
|
2.50
|
RATIO
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.60
|
0.47
|
0.40
|
0.78
|
0.27
|
1.11
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.33
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.28
|
0.07
|
0.44
|
NEG/MIN
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.93
|
0.67
|
0.60
|
1.06
|
0.33
|
1.56
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.20
|
0.50
|
0.20
|
0.67
|
RISK/REWARD
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
CSB RANK
|
26
|
16
|
160
|
10
|
120
|
12
|
CSB RANK
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#3 Dalton Thrower had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.80, and a d-zone ratio of 2.09 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won only 1 of 4 defensive-zone puck-battles, and recovered 5 loose-pucks. He was successful with 13 of his 18 d-zone passes, and was involved in 2.27 d-zone events per-minute played. He also blocked 3 shots.
#4 Matt Finn earned a d-zone rating of 0.93, and a defensive-zone ratio of 2.27 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won only 2 of 5 puck-battles, and recovered 7 loose-pucks. He was successful with 11 of his 13 pass-attempts, but failed with each of his 2 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He was involved in 2.4 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#6 Gianluca Curcuruto had a solid d-zone risk/reward rating of 1.20, and a d-zone ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost both his d-zone puck-battles, but recovered an impressive 13 loose-pucks. He was successful with 11 of his 16 pass-attempts, and was involved in 2.8 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#8 Griffin Reinhart earned a lower-than-expected defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.83 and d-zone ratio of 2.07 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. In fact, he had the second lowest d-zone rating among this group of players. He lost 3 of 7 puck-battles, and recovered 10 loose pucks. He was successful with 14 of his 20 passes, and was involved in 2.39 d-zone events per-minute played.
#27 Adam Pelech had this group's second-highest defensive-zone risk/reward rating at 1.33. He also had the top d-zone ratio, as he made 3.86 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of his 4 puck-battles, recovered 8 loose-pucks, and was successful with 11 of his 13 pass-attempts. He blocked 3 shots, completed 1 dump-out, and was involved in 2.27 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#51 Derrick Pouliot earned this group's top d-zone rating at 1.78. He also had the second-best defensive-zone ratio, as he made 3.13 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 4 of 6 puck-battles, recovered 10 loose pucks, and was successful with 20 of his 28 pass-attempts. He blocked 2 shots, intercepted 2 passes, and used a poke-check to remove puck-possession from an opposing player on 6 separate occasions.
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
DZ POS
|
23
|
25
|
30
|
29
|
27
|
47
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
11
|
11
|
12
|
14
|
7
|
15
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.09
|
2.27
|
2.50
|
2.07
|
3.86
|
3.13
|
RATIO
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.53
|
1.67
|
2.00
|
1.61
|
1.80
|
2.61
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.80
|
0.78
|
0.47
|
0.83
|
NEG/MIN
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
2.27
|
2.40
|
2.80
|
2.39
|
2.27
|
3.44
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.80
|
0.93
|
1.20
|
0.83
|
1.33
|
1.78
|
RISK/REWARD
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
CSB RANK
|
26
|
16
|
160
|
10
|
120
|
12
|
CSB RANK
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
The top neutral-zone risk/reward rating was earned by #8 Griffin Reinhart. The second-best rating belong to #4 Matt Finn, while the lowest neutral zone rating belonged to #27 Adam Pelech.
The top n-zone ratio was earned by #8 Griffin Reinhart, while the lowest ratio belonged to #27 Adam Pelech. Reinhart was helped by his 7 successful neutral-zone passes, while Pelech's ratio was hurt by his inability to successfully dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone, as he failed to do this on 2 occassions.
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
NZ POS
|
5
|
10
|
4
|
12
|
3
|
9
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
5.00
|
5.00
|
2.00
|
6.00
|
1.00
|
4.50
|
RATIO
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.33
|
0.67
|
0.27
|
0.67
|
0.20
|
0.50
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.07
|
0.13
|
0.13
|
0.11
|
0.20
|
0.11
|
NEG/MIN
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.40
|
0.80
|
0.40
|
0.78
|
0.40
|
0.61
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.27
|
0.53
|
0.13
|
0.56
|
0.00
|
0.39
|
RISK/REWARD
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
27
|
51
| ||
CSB RANK
|
26
|
16
|
160
|
10
|
120
|
12
|
CSB RANK
|
No comments:
Post a Comment