#4 Mikko Vainonen is a 6' 3", 207 lbs left-handed defenseman. He is Central Scouting's 11th-ranked European skater. He had no points in 8 games with HIFK's top team, and 18 points in 38 junior-level games.
#18 Esa Lindell is a 6' 3", 190 lbs left-handed defenseman. He is Central Scouting's 12th-ranked European skater. He scored 21 goals and added 30 assists in 48 games with Jokerit in the Finnish Junior League.
#19 Teuvo Teravainen is a 5' 11", 164 lbs left-handed left-winger. He is Central Scouting's 2nd-ranked European forward; up from 7th on the mid-term rankings. He scored 11 goals and 7 assists in 40 games with Jokerit in the Finnish Elite League. He also had 12 goals and 8 assists in only 11 junior-level games. If he was born just 5 days later, he would only be eligible for the 2013 draft; making him one of the youngest and most intriguing prospects available.
#21 Ville Pokka is a 6' 0", 196 lbs right-handed defenseman. He is the CSB's 5th-ranked European skater. He was also named to Finland's Under-20 roster for the World Junior Championship. He produced 7 points in 4 junior-level games, and 3 assists in 35 with Karpat's top team.
#25 Henrik Haapala is a 5' 9", 149 lbs left-handed forward. He is the CSB's 108th-ranked skater; up from 123 mid-term. He had 45 points in 46 games with Tappara in the Finnish junior league, and 10 points in 7 Under-18 Championship games.
#26 Rasmus Kulmala is a 5'8", 160 lbs left-handed forward. He is the CSB's 27th-ranked European skater. He had 9 points in 7 under-18 Championship games, and 29 points in 32 games in the Finnish junior league. He also played 25 games in the Finnish Elite League, producing a goal and an assist.
OVERALL GRADE
Five out of the six players scouted in this game earned an above-average grade. The top grade was earned by #26 Kulmala. He had an assist, 2 shots and an even traditional plus/minus. The lowest grade was earned by #4 Vainonen. His grade was hurt by his work in the defensive-zone. #25 Haapala's grade was buoyed by an impressive offensive-output of 4 points during the game.
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
WINS
|
49
|
39
|
69
|
77
|
42
|
63
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
75
|
54
|
96
|
107
|
58
|
83
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
65
|
72
|
72
|
72
|
72
|
76
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| |
CSB RANK
|
11
|
12
|
2
|
5
|
108
|
27
|
CSB RANK
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#4 Mikko Vainonen (defenseman) had a below-average even-strength risk/reward rating of 0.79, and a ratio of 1.68 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was actually produced in the offensive-zone, and he engaged in 3.09 events per-minute of ice-time.
#18 Esa Lindell (defenseman) earned an ES risk/reward rating of 1.14, and a ratio of 2.29 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was produced in the defensive and neutral-zones, and he engaged in 2.92 events per-minute of ice-time.
#19 Teuvo Teravainen (forward) earned this group's second best even-strength risk/reward rating at 1.59, and a ratio of 2.39 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was produced in both the offensive and defensive-zones, and he engaged in an impressive 3.87 events per-minute played.
#21 Ville Pokka (defenseman) produced an ES risk/reward rating of 1.09, and a ratio of 2.21 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work came in the defensive-zone, and he engaged in 2.9 events per-minute of ice-time.
#25 Henrik Haapala (forward) had an ES rating of 0.52, and an even-strength ratio of 1.47 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was produced in the offensive-zone, while his work in the d-zone hurt his grade. Overall, he engaged in 2.73 ES events per minute-played.
#26 Rasmus Kulmala (forward) had this group's top even-strength risk/reward rating (1.81) and ratio (2.87). He was strong in all 3 zones, but his best work came in the defensive-zone. He engaged in an impressive 3.74 events per-minute played.
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
POS
|
37
|
32
|
43
|
42
|
22
|
43
|
POS
|
NEG
|
22
|
14
|
18
|
19
|
15
|
15
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.68
|
2.29
|
2.39
|
2.21
|
1.47
|
2.87
|
RATIO
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.94
|
2.03
|
2.73
|
2.00
|
1.62
|
2.78
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.15
|
0.89
|
1.14
|
0.90
|
1.11
|
0.97
|
NEG/MIN
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
3.09
|
2.92
|
3.87
|
2.90
|
2.73
|
3.74
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.79
|
1.14
|
1.59
|
1.09
|
0.52
|
1.81
|
RISK/REWARD
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
CSB RANK
|
11
|
12
|
2
|
5
|
108
|
27
|
CSB RANK
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#4 Mikko Vainonen (defenseman) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.31, and an o-zone ratio of 2.2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 6 loose-pucks, but was successful with only 1 of 4 passes. He was able to get both of his attempted shots on net, and engaged in 0.84 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#18 Esa Lindell (defenseman) had an o-zone rating of 0.00, and a ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, and was able to get 1 of his 2 shot-attempts through to the net. He engaged in 0.51 o-zone events per-minute played.
#19 Teuvo Teravainen (forward) had this group's top offensive-zone risk/reward rating. He earned an o-zone rating of 0.63, and an offensive-zone ratio of 2.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 8 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of 6 passes. He engaged in an impressive 1.65 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#21 Ville Pokka (defenseman) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.19, and an impressive o-zone ratio of 5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with his only pass-attempt. He engaged in only 0.29 o-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#25 Henrik Haapala (forward) had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.30, and an o-zone ratio of 1.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 6 loose-pucks, and was successful with 1 of 3 passes. He was able to get 3 of his 5 shots through to the net, and engaged in 1.48 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#26 Rasmus Kulmala (forward) earned the second-best o-zone rating among this group. He had an o-zone rating of 0.58, and an offensive-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost both his puck-battles, but recovered 5 loose-pucks. He completed 5 of 7 passes, and was successful with an impressive 5 of 6 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He engaged in 1.74 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
OZ POS
|
11
|
4
|
18
|
5
|
12
|
18
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
5
|
4
|
8
|
1
|
8
|
9
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.2
|
1
|
2.25
|
5
|
1.5
|
2
|
RATIO
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.58
|
0.25
|
1.14
|
0.24
|
0.89
|
1.16
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.26
|
0.25
|
0.51
|
0.05
|
0.59
|
0.58
|
NEG/MIN
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.84
|
0.51
|
1.65
|
0.29
|
1.48
|
1.74
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.31
|
0.00
|
0.63
|
0.19
|
0.30
|
0.58
|
RISK/REWARD
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
CSB RANK
|
11
|
12
|
2
|
5
|
108
|
27
|
CSB RANK
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#4 Mikko Vainonen (defenseman) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.26, and a d-zone ratio of 1.36 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 1 of 2 puck-battles, and recovered 4 loose-pucks. He was successful with 12 of 19 defensive-zone passes, and engaged in 1.73 d-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#18 Esa Lindell (defenseman) had a d-zone rating of 0.57, and a defensive-zone ratio of 2.13 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 3 of 4 puck-battles, recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with all 8 of his d-zone pass-attempts. He failed with 2 dekes, and 3 of 4 shot-blocking attempts, while engaging in 1.59 d-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#19 Teuvo Teravainen (forward) earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.63, and a defensive-zone ratio of 2.43 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 3 of 5 puck-battles, recovered 6 loose-pucks, and was successful with 5 of 7 defensive-zone pass-attempts. He beat 2 opposing players 1on1 (deke), and engaged in 1.08 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#21 Ville Pokka (defenseman) earned a defensive-zone rating of 0.71, and a d-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of 3 puck-battles, and recovered 8 loose-pucks. He was successful with 15 of 20 defensive-zone pass-attempts, and engaged in 2.14 defensive-zone events per-minute of play.
#25 Henrik Haapala (forward) had a d-zone rating of 0.00, and a d-zone ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and failed with his only pass-attempt. He engaged in 0.59 defensive-zone events per-minute of play.
#26 Rasmus Kulmala (forward) had an impressive defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.97, and an incredible d-zone ratio of 4.75 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 8 loose-pucks, and was successful with 4 of 6 d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.48 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
DZ POS
|
19
|
17
|
17
|
30
|
4
|
19
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
14
|
8
|
7
|
15
|
4
|
4
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.36
|
2.13
|
2.43
|
2.00
|
1.00
|
4.75
|
RATIO
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.00
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.43
|
0.30
|
1.23
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.73
|
0.51
|
0.44
|
0.71
|
0.30
|
0.26
|
NEG/MIN
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
1.73
|
1.59
|
1.52
|
2.14
|
0.59
|
1.48
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.26
|
0.57
|
0.63
|
0.71
|
0.00
|
0.97
|
RISK/REWARD
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
CSB RANK
|
11
|
12
|
2
|
5
|
108
|
27
|
CSB RANK
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
All six prospects produced solid neutral-zone numbers. The top neutral-zone risk/reward rating was earned by #18 Lindell. He had a neutral-zone rating of 0.57, and an impressive ratio of 5.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. The lowest n-zone rating was earned by #21 Pokka (0.21), while the lowest ratio was produced by #25 Haapala (2.00).
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
NZ POS
|
7
|
11
|
8
|
7
|
6
|
6
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.33
|
5.50
|
2.67
|
2.33
|
2.00
|
3.00
|
RATIO
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.37
|
0.70
|
0.51
|
0.33
|
0.44
|
0.39
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.16
|
0.13
|
0.19
|
0.14
|
0.22
|
0.13
|
NEG/MIN
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.52
|
0.82
|
0.70
|
0.48
|
0.66
|
0.52
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.21
|
0.57
|
0.32
|
0.19
|
0.22
|
0.26
|
RISK/REWARD
|
4
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
25
|
26
| ||
CSB RANK
|
11
|
12
|
2
|
5
|
108
|
27
|
CSB RANK
|
No comments:
Post a Comment