#7 Matt Grzelcyk
#8 Jacob Trouba
#9 Kyle Osterberg
#10 Pat Sieloff
#13 Frank Vatrano
#14 Thomas Dipauli
#15 Daniel O'Regan
#16 Brady Skjei
#17 Nikolas Kerdiles
#19 Cam Darcy
#21 Matt Lane
#22 Riley Barber
#24 Connor Carrick
#26 Andrew Copp
#27 Quentin Shore
OVERALL GRADE
This top overall grade was earned by #24 Connor Carrick. Other players with grades above 78 include #7 Matt Grzelcyk, #10 Pat Sieloff, #14 Tomas Dipauli, and #15 Daniel O'Regan.
The lowest grade was produced by #19 Cam Darcy. The only other players with grades below 65 were #27 Quentin Shore , and possible first round pick, #16 Brady Skjei.
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
WINS
|
19
|
26
|
13
|
16
|
13
|
31
|
34
|
25
|
19
|
11
|
12
|
10
|
21
|
17
|
14
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
24
|
35
|
17
|
20
|
18
|
40
|
43
|
41
|
28
|
21
|
17
|
14
|
23
|
23
|
22
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
79
|
74
|
76
|
80
|
72
|
78
|
79
|
61
|
68
|
52
|
71
|
71
|
91
|
74
|
64
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| |
177
|
9
|
NR
|
31
|
88
|
81
|
76
|
19
|
29
|
134
|
150
|
86
|
124
|
NR
|
80
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
The best even-strength risk/reward was earned by #15 Daniel O'Regan. He earned an ES risk/reward rating of 3.57, and an impressive ratio of 3.78 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. Other players with risk/reward ratings above 2.00 include; #24 Connor Carrick, and #14 Thomas Dipauli. Carrick had the top ratio, as he was successful with an absolutely incredible 10.5 plays for every 1 unsuccessful play.
The lowest risk/reward belonged to #19 Cam Darcy. The only other American players with rating below 1.0 were #16 Brady Skjei, and #27 Quentin Shore.
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
POS
|
19
|
26
|
13
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
34
|
23
|
19
|
10
|
12
|
10
|
21
|
17
|
14
|
POS
|
NEG
|
5
|
10
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
7
|
9
|
15
|
9
|
10
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
8
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
3.80
|
2.60
|
3.25
|
3.20
|
2.60
|
4.14
|
3.78
|
1.53
|
2.11
|
1.00
|
2.40
|
2.50
|
10.50
|
2.83
|
1.75
|
RATIO
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
2.11
|
2.89
|
1.86
|
1.78
|
1.86
|
4.14
|
4.86
|
2.56
|
2.71
|
1.43
|
1.71
|
1.43
|
2.33
|
2.43
|
2.00
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.56
|
1.11
|
0.57
|
0.56
|
0.71
|
1.00
|
1.29
|
1.67
|
1.29
|
1.43
|
0.71
|
0.57
|
0.22
|
0.86
|
1.14
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
2.67
|
4.00
|
2.43
|
2.33
|
2.57
|
5.14
|
6.14
|
4.22
|
4.00
|
2.86
|
2.43
|
2.00
|
2.56
|
3.29
|
3.14
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.56
|
1.78
|
1.29
|
1.22
|
1.14
|
3.14
|
3.57
|
0.89
|
1.43
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
0.86
|
2.11
|
1.57
|
0.86
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
177
|
9
|
NR
|
31
|
88
|
81
|
76
|
19
|
29
|
134
|
150
|
86
|
124
|
NR
|
80
|
CSB RANK
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#7 Matt Grzelcyk (defenseman) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.11, and an o-zone ratio of 1.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with 2 of 3 passes. He engaged 0.56 o-zone events per-minute played.
#8 Jacob Trouba (defenseman) had a surprisingly-low offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.00, and an o-zone ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 2 loose-pucks, but was only able to get 1 of his 3 shot-attempts through to the net. He engaged in 0.64 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#9 Kyle Osterberg (forward) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.14, and an impressive o-zone ratio of 3.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won both his puck-battles, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 6 pass-attempts. He engaged in 2 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#10 Pat Sieloff (defenseman) engaged in only 1 offensive-zone event during the game. He was successful with his only attempted shot on net.
#13 Frank Vatrano (forward) had an o-zone rating of 1.14 and an incredible offensive-zone ratio of 9 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was successful with each of his 3 passes. He engaged in 1.43 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#14 Thomas Dipauli (forward) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.0, and a ratio of 3.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of 4 passes. He engaged in 1.86 o-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#15 Daniel O'Regan (forward) earned an impressive offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 2.29, and had an offensive-zone ratio of 3.29 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 10 loose-pucks, and was successful with 7 of 9 passes.
#16 Brady Skjei (defenseman) had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.33, and an impressive o-zone ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 1 loose-puck and was successful with his only pass and deke attempts. He engaged in 0.56 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#17 Nikolas Kerdiles (forward) earned an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.57, and a ratio of 1.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 5 loose-pucks, but was only successful with 2 of his 6 pass-attempts. He engaged in 2.29 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#19 Cam Darcy (forward) earned an o-zone rating of 0.00, and an offensive-zone ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, and was successful with 1 of his 3 passes. He engaged in 1.14 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#21 Matt Lane (forward) had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.43, and an o-zone ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 1 loose-puck, lost 1 puck-race, and engaged in 1 offensive-zone event per-minute played.
#22 Riley Barber (forward) produced an o-zone risk/reward rating of 0.14, and a ratio of 1.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was successful with 1 of his 2 passes. He engaged in 1 offensive-zone event per-minute of ice-time.
#24 Connor Carrick (defenseman) had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.67. He was successful with each of his 6 offensive-zone events. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and was able to get each of his 3 shot-attempts through to the net.
#26 Andrew Copp (forward) had an offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.14, and a ratio of 1.2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 1 of 2 puck-battles, and was successful with 2 of his 4 attempts to beat Swedish players 1on1 (deke). He engaged in 1.57 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#27 Quentin Shore (forward) had an offensive-zone rating of 0.57, and an o-zone ratio of 3 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was successful with 2 of his 3 pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.14 o-zone events per minute played.
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
OZ POS
|
3
|
3
|
11
|
1
|
9
|
10
|
23
|
4
|
10
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
7
|
1
|
6
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
5
|
2
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.50
|
1.00
|
3.67
|
N/A
|
9.00
|
3.33
|
3.29
|
4.00
|
1.67
|
1.00
|
2.50
|
1.33
|
N/A
|
1.20
|
3.00
|
RATIO
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
1.57
|
0.11
|
1.29
|
1.43
|
3.29
|
0.44
|
1.43
|
0.57
|
0.71
|
0.57
|
0.67
|
0.86
|
0.86
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.22
|
0.33
|
0.43
|
0.00
|
0.14
|
0.43
|
1.00
|
0.11
|
0.86
|
0.57
|
0.29
|
0.43
|
0.00
|
0.71
|
0.29
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.56
|
0.67
|
2.00
|
0.11
|
1.43
|
1.86
|
4.29
|
0.56
|
2.29
|
1.14
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
0.67
|
1.57
|
1.14
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.11
|
0.00
|
1.14
|
0.11
|
1.14
|
1.00
|
2.29
|
0.33
|
0.57
|
0.00
|
0.43
|
0.14
|
0.67
|
0.14
|
0.57
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
177
|
9
|
NR
|
31
|
88
|
81
|
76
|
19
|
29
|
134
|
150
|
86
|
124
|
NR
|
80
|
CSB RANK
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#7 Matt Grzelcyk (defenseman) earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.22, and a d-zone ratio of 4.67 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of 3 puck-battles, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and was successful with 6 of 8 d-zone passes. He engaged in 1.89 d-zone events per-minute played.
#8 Jacob Trouba (defenseman) had a team-high defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.89, and a d-zone ratio of 3.83 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won an impressive 7 of 8 puck-battles, recovered 5 loose-pucks, and was successful with 9 of 12 d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 3.22 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#9 Kyle Osterberg (forward) earned a d-zone rating of 0.29, and was successful with both of his d-zone events. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and was successful with his only pass.
#10 Pat Sieloff (defenseman) earned a defensive-rating of 0.89, and a d-zone ratio of 5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of 3 puck-battles, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and was successful with each of his 5 passes. He engaged in 1.33 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#13 Frank Vatrano (forward) had a terrible d-zone risk/reward rating of -0.14, and a defensive-zone ratio of 0.75 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. This means that he made more unsuccessful than successful plays in the defensive-zone. He recovered 2 loose-pucks, but lost one puck-race and he wasn't able to complete his only pass-attempt. He engaged in 1 defensive-zone event per-minute of ice-time.
#14 Thomas Dipauli (forward) earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.71, and a d-zone ratio of 2.25 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play; excellent numbers for a forward. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 4 loose-pucks, and blocked 2 shots. He was only successful with 1 of 4 pass-attempts, and engaged in 1.86 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#15 Daniel O'Regan (forward) earned an excellent defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.71, and an equally impressive d-zone ratio of 3.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 2 of his 3 pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.39 defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#16 Brady Skjei (defenseman) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.44, and a d-zone ratio of 1.33 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of 3 puck-battles, and recovered an impressive 8 loose-pucks. He was only successful with 4 of 10 defensive-zone passes, and engaged in 3.11 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#17 Nikolas Kerdiles (forward) earned a a d-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and was successful with both of his defensive-zone events. He recovered 1 loose-puck, and completed his only pass-attempt.
#19 Cam Darcy (forward) earned a brutal defensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.57, and was successful with only 1 of his 6 defensive-zone events. He lost both his puck-battles, and was unsuccessful with his only pass-attempt.
#21 Matt Lane (forward) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.29, and a d-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He lost his only puck-battle. But, recovered 2 loose-pucks, and engaged in 0.86 d-zone events per-minute played.
#22 Riley Barber (forward) produced a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.00, and a d-zone ratio of 1 successful play for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 1 of 2 puck-battles, and engaged in 0.29 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#24 Connor Carrick (defenseman) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.00, and an impressive d-zone ratio of 5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won both his puck-battles, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with each of his 4 d-zone passes. He engaged in 1.44 d-zone events per-minute played.
#26 Andrew Copp (forward) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 1.14, and was successful with each of his 8 defensive-zone events. He recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with each of his 4 defensive-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.14 d-zone events per-minute played.
#27 Quentin Shore (forward) had a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.14. and was successful with only 2 of his 5 defensive-zone events. He lost both his puck-battles, and was unsuccessful with his only pass-attempt. He engaged in 0.71 d-zone events per-minute played.
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
DZ POS
|
14
|
23
|
2
|
10
|
3
|
9
|
7
|
16
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
11
|
8
|
2
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
3
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
12
|
0
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
4.67
|
3.83
|
N/A
|
5.00
|
0.75
|
2.25
|
3.50
|
1.33
|
N/A
|
0.20
|
2.00
|
1.00
|
5.50
|
N/A
|
0.67
|
RATIO
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.56
|
2.56
|
0.29
|
1.11
|
0.43
|
1.29
|
1.00
|
1.78
|
0.29
|
0.14
|
0.57
|
0.14
|
1.22
|
1.14
|
0.29
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.33
|
0.67
|
0.00
|
0.22
|
0.57
|
0.57
|
0.29
|
1.33
|
0.00
|
0.71
|
0.29
|
0.14
|
0.22
|
0.00
|
0.43
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
1.89
|
3.22
|
0.29
|
1.33
|
1.00
|
1.86
|
1.29
|
3.11
|
0.29
|
0.86
|
0.86
|
0.29
|
1.44
|
1.14
|
0.71
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.22
|
1.89
|
0.29
|
0.89
|
-0.14
|
0.71
|
0.71
|
0.44
|
0.29
|
-0.57
|
0.29
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.14
|
-0.14
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
177
|
9
|
NR
|
31
|
88
|
81
|
76
|
19
|
29
|
134
|
150
|
86
|
124
|
NR
|
80
|
CSB RANK
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Five players were perfect in the neutral-zone. This means that they were successful with all of their neutral-zone events. They include #7 Matt Grzelcyk, #14 Thomas Dipauli, #15 Daniel O'Regan, #22 Riley Barber, and #24 Connor Carrick.
Kyle Osterberg #9 was the only US player with a negative neutral-zone risk/reward rating. That said, he engaged in only 1 n-zone event the entire game.
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
NZ POS
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
10
|
4
|
3
|
7
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
N/A
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.67
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1.50
|
2.33
|
5.00
|
3.00
|
NA
|
N/A
|
3.00
|
2.00
|
RATIO
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
26
|
27
| |||
POS/MIN
|
0.22
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.56
|
0.14
|
1.43
|
0.57
|
0.33
|
1.00
|
0.71
|
0.43
|
0.71
|
0.44
|
0.43
|
0.86
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.00
|
0.11
|
0.14
|
0.33
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.22
|
0.43
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.14
|
0.43
|
NEG/MIN
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.22
|
0.11
|
0.14
|
0.89
|
0.14
|
1.43
|
0.57
|
0.56
|
1.43
|
0.86
|
0.57
|
0.71
|
0.44
|
0.57
|
1.29
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.22
|
-0.11
|
-0.14
|
0.22
|
0.14
|
1.43
|
0.57
|
0.11
|
0.57
|
0.57
|
0.29
|
0.71
|
0.44
|
0.29
|
0.43
|
RISK/REWARD
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
| ||
CSB RANK
|
177
|
9
|
NR
|
31
|
88
|
81
|
76
|
19
|
29
|
134
|
150
|
86
|
124
|
NR
|
80
|
CSB RANK
|
No comments:
Post a Comment