This one-game scouting report is from team Russia's 3-1 win over Slovakia in the World Junior Championship. The game took place on December 28th, 2011.
OVERALL GRADE
#10 Yakupov had a below-average overall grade of 65. He struggled completing passes in the offensive-zone, while he excelled carrying the puck through the neutral-zone. He had an assist, a plus-1 traditional plus/minus, and 2 shots on goal.
#17 Grigorenko earned a slightly below-average grade of 68. He had trouble completing passes through the neutral-zone, as his soft back-hand passes were intercepted 3 times. He had an assist, a plus-1 rating and 1 shot on goal.
10
|
17
| ||
WINS
|
49
|
50
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
75
|
74
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
65
|
68
|
GRADE
|
PLAYER
|
10
|
17
| |
CSB RANK
|
1
|
3
|
CSB RANK
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#10 Yakupov had an even-strength risk/reward rating of 1.38, and a ratio of 1.64 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was produced in the neutral-zone, and he engaged in an incredible 5.68 events per-minute of ice-time. His rating was helped by his high event total.
#17 Grigorenko earned an even-strength risk/reward raring of 1.29, and a ratio of 1.62 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. His best work was produced in the offensive and defensive-zones, and he engaged in an impressive 5.46 events per-minute played. As with Yakupov, his rating was helped by his high event total.
10
|
17
| ||
POS
|
41
|
42
|
POS
|
NEG
|
25
|
26
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.64
|
1.62
|
RATIO
|
10
|
17
| ||
POS/MIN
|
3.53
|
3.37
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
2.15
|
2.09
|
NEG/MIN
|
10
|
17
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
5.68
|
5.46
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.38
|
1.29
|
RISK/REWARD
|
10
|
17
| ||
CSB RANK
|
1
|
3
|
CSB RANK
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD AND RATIO
#10 Yakupov had an unusually-low offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.17. His rating was hurt by his inability to beat opposing players 1on1, and by the inability of his linemates to handle his high-risk, but on-the-tape passes. He had an offensive-zone ratio of 1.1 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 1of 2 puck-battles, recovered 8 loose-pucks, and was successful with only 5 of his 13 passes. He was also successful with 4 of his 8 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke), and engaged in an impressive 3.61 offensive-zone events per-minute played.
#17 Grigorenko earned a solid offensive-zone rating of 0.64, and an o-zone ratio of 1.73 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 7 loose-pucks, and was successful with 7 of his 13 passes. He was able to get 1 of his 2 shot-attempts through to the net, and he engaged in 2.41 events per-minute played.
10
|
17
| ||
OZ POS
|
22
|
19
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
20
|
11
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
1.1
|
1.73
|
RATIO
|
10
|
17
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.89
|
1.53
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.72
|
0.88
|
NEG/MIN
|
10
|
17
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
3.61
|
2.41
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.17
|
0.64
|
RISK/REWARD
|
10
|
17
| ||
CSB RANK
|
1
|
3
|
CSB RANK
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
#10 Yakupov eared a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.43, and an impressive ratio of 3.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with both of his passes. He was also successful with his only attempted deke, and engaged in a low 0.77 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
#17 Grigorenko earned a defensive-zone rating of 0.48, and a ratio of 2.5 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only puck-battle, recovered 5 loose-pucks, and was successful with 3 of his 6 d-zone pass-attempts. He engaged in 1.12 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
10
|
17
| ||
DZ POS
|
7
|
10
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
2
|
4
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
3.5
|
2.50
|
RATIO
|
10
|
17
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.60
|
0.80
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.17
|
0.32
|
NEG/MIN
|
10
|
17
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.77
|
1.12
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.43
|
0.48
|
RISK/REWARD
|
10
|
17
| ||
CSB RANK
|
1
|
3
|
CSB RANK
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Both players like to carry the puck through the neutral-zone. Yakupov however, was much more successful than Grigorenko during this particular game. Both players also engaged in more neutral-zone events than defensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
#10 Yakupov earned a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.77, and an impressive neutral-zone ratio of 4 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He recovered 3 loose-pucks, and was successful with 5 of 6 neutral-zone passes. He was successful with both of his n-zone dekes, and intercepted 1 opposition pass. He engaged in 1.29 n-zone events per-minute played.
#17 Grigorenko had a neutral-zone rating of 0.16, and a neutral-zone ratio of only 1.18 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won only 3 of 7 puck-battles, and was successful with only 3 of 7 neutral-zone passes. He intercepted 3 opposition passes, and engaged in 1.93 neutral-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
10
|
17
| ||
NZ POS
|
12
|
13
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
3
|
11
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
4
|
1.18
|
RATIO
|
10
|
17
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.03
|
1.04
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.26
|
0.88
|
NEG/MIN
|
10
|
17
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
1.29
|
1.93
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.77
|
0.16
|
RISK/REWARD
|
10
|
17
| ||
CSB RANK
|
1
|
3
|
CSB RANK
|
No comments:
Post a Comment