OVERALL GRADE
Bouillon produced an above-average overall grade of 72. His best work was done in the defensive-zone, where 62% of his events took place. He had a traditional plus/minus of plus-1, and showed confidence skating the puck out of the defensive-zone. In fact, he was more successful skating the puck up ice than he was passing the puck up ice.
the average overall grade for defensemen is 69
51
| ||
WINS
|
34
|
WINS
|
EVENTS
|
47
|
EVENTS
|
GRADE
|
72
|
GRADE
|
51
|
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Bouillon had an even-strength risk/reward rating of 1.37, and an ES ratio of 2.36 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He engaged in 3.4 events per-minute of ice-time, and did not play on the powerplay or kill any penalties.
*the average ES risk/reward rating for defensemen is 1.36
*the average ES ratio for defensemen is 2.25
51
| ||
POS
|
33
|
POS
|
NEG
|
14
|
NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.36
|
RATIO
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
2.38
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
1.01
|
NEG/MIN
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
3.40
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
1.37
|
RISK/REWARD
|
51
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Bouillon had a below-average offensive-zone risk/reward rating of -0.07, and an o-zone ratio of 0.80 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. This means that Bouillon failed more often than he succeeded when engaging in offensive-zone events. He recovered 4 loose-pucks, but failed with both his offensive-zone pass-attempts. He also failed with his only attempted deke, and was unable to get his only shot attempt through to the net. He engaged in 0.65 offensive-zone events per-minute of ice-time.
*the average offensive-zone risk/reward rating for defensemen is 0.16
*the average offensive-zone ratio for defensemen is 1.69
51
| ||
OZ POS
|
4
|
OZ POS
|
OZ NEG
|
5
|
OZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
0.80
|
RATIO.
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.29
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.36
|
NEG/MIN
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
0.65
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
-0.07
|
RISK/REWARD
|
51
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Bouillon earned a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.79, and a d-zone ratio of 2.22 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won 2 of 3 puck battles, and recovered 8 loose-pucks. He completed only 3 of 8 d-zone pass-attempts, but was successful with all 4 of his attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He blocked 1 shot, intercepted 1 pass, and engaged in 2.10 defensive-zone events per-minute played.
*the average defensive-zone risk/reward rating for defensemen is 0.93
*the average defensive-zone ratio for defensemen is 2.25
51
| ||
DZ POS
|
20
|
DZ POS
|
DZ NEG
|
9
|
DZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
2.22
|
RATIO
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
1.45
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.65
|
NEG/MIN
|
51
| ||
EVENTS/ MIN
|
2.10
|
EVENTS/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.79
|
RISK/REWARD
|
51
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Bouillon was perfect in the neutral-zone. He did a great job both managing and passing the puck in the n-zone, and produced a neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.65. He recovered 1 loose-puck, completed 4 passes, and was successful with each of his 3 attempts to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone. He engaged in 0.65 neutral-zone events per-minute played.
*the average neutral-zone risk/reward rating for defensemen is 0.30
*the average neutral-zone ratio for defensemen is 2.13
51
| ||
NZ POS
|
9
|
NZ POS
|
NZ NEG
|
0
|
NZ NEG
|
RATIO
|
N/A
|
RATIO
|
51
| ||
POS/MIN
|
0.65
|
POS/MIN
|
NEG/MIN
|
0.00
|
NEG/MIN
|
51
| ||
EV/ MIN
|
0.65
|
EV/ MIN
|
RISK/REWARD
|
0.65
|
RISK/REWARD
|
51
|
No comments:
Post a Comment