Total events tracked for Subban: 5,922 *most on 2011-12 Habs
Total even-strength minutes played: 1470.7 *2nd most on 2011-12 Habs
BELOW THE STATS AND RANKINGS I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED EACH PLAYER'S GAME BY GAME POSSESSION AND DEFENSIVE RATING, AS WELL AS THE IMPACT THEIR PERFORMANCE HAD ON THE TEAM'S WINNING-PERCENTAGE.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
NEUTRAL-ZONE TENDENCIES
DEFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
POWERPLAY TENDENCIES
The charts below represent Subban's statistics during the 2011-12 season. The first chart reflects his play in the offensive-zone, while the second chart represents his play in the defensive-zone.
The first column within each chart lists each category. The second column indicates his rating/ratio/success-rate/event per-minute within that category. The third column is the team average, while the fourth and fifth show his ranking among teammates. The first ranking is where he ranked among all 24 of his returning teammates, the second ranking is versus 8 returning defensemen (Kaberle, Gorges, Diaz, St. Denis, Weber, Subban, Markov, Subban).
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Subban ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- Attempted o-zone dekes per-minute
- Successful o-zone dekes per-minute
- Shots through to the net per-minute
Where Subban ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- Forechecking success-rate
- Successful o-zone puck-possession plays per-minute
- O-zone dekes success-rate
- Success-rate getting shots through to the net
Where Subban ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Offensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute
- Intercepted opposition passes per-minute
- O-zone passing success-rate
- True shooting percentage (goals scored / attempted shots)
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 0.24 | 0.30 | 16 | 3 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 1.96 | 1.64 | 3 | 3 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.11 | 0.25 | 21 | 5 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 48.9% | 49.8% | 13 | 4 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 0.73 | 1.24 | 19 | 3 |
| FORECHECKING SUCCESS-RATE | 78.0% | 71.1% | 2 | 2 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (O-ZONE) | 0.040 | 0.062 | 22 | 6 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 0.30 | 0.42 | 16 | 2 |
| O-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 61.6% | 56.6% | 5 | 3 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.24 | 0.40 | 19 | 3 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.16 | 0.24 | 18 | 3 |
| O-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 65.4% | 60.7% | 7 | 6 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.09 | 0.13 | 15 | 1 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.07 | 0.07 | 8 | 1 |
| O-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 79.7% | 56.1% | 2 | 2 |
| ATTEMPTED SHOTS PER-MINUTE | 0.16 | 0.21 | 15 | 3 |
| SHOTS THROUGH TO THE NET PER-MINUTE | 0.07 | 0.10 | 14 | 1 |
| SHOTS THROUGH SUCCESS-RATE | 45.9% | 49.1% | 16 | 2 |
| TRUE SHOOTING-PERCENTAGE (GOALS / ATTEMPTED SHOTS) | 0.9% | 3.7% | 19 | 6 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 13.2 | 3.1 | ||
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Subban ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone risk/reward rating
- Defensive-zone events per-minute
- Successful d-zone puck-possession plays per-minute.
- Attempted d-zone passes per-minute
- Successful d-zone passes per-minute
- Attempted d-zone dekes per-minute
- Successful d-zone dekes per-minute
- Attempted dump-outs per-minute
- Successful dump-outs per-minute
Where Subban ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone ratio (number of successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play)
- Defensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute
- Intercepted opposition passes per-minute
Where Subban ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Blocked shots per-minute
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1 | 1 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 2.49 | 2.12 | 2 | 2 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.47 | 0.32 | 2 | 2 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 51.1% | 53.1% | 11 | 6 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 2.78 | 1.68 | 1 | 1 |
| DEFENDING IN D-ZONE SUCCESS-RATE | 69.4% | 68.3% | 8 | 3 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.116 | 0.086 | 2 | 2 |
| BLOCKED SHOTS PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.069 | 0.065 | 7 | 7 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 1.12 | 0.55 | 1 | 1 |
| D-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 72.8% | 67.5% | 3 | 3 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 1.19 | 0.64 | 1 | 1 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.89 | 0.19 | 1 | 1 |
| D-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 75.0% | 70.7% | 4 | 3 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.16 | 0.05 | 1 | 1 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.11 | 0.03 | 1 | 1 |
| D-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 69.2% | 57.0% | 3 | 3 |
| ATTEMPTED DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.17 | 0.11 | 1 | 1 |
| DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1 | 1 |
| DUMP-OUTS SUCCESS-RATE | 68.8% | 65.0% | 6 | 3 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 3.0 | 2.3 | ||
The Montreal Canadiens ended the season with a .378 winning-percentage. PK Subban played in 81 of the team's 82 games. When Subban was in the line-up the Habs winning-percentage rose slightly to .382.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and shots that hit the net by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and passes.
Subban had an offensive-zone possession success-rate above 80% in 15 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 6-9 record, and a winning-percentage of .400. In games where Subban's o-zone possession rating was above 60%, the Habs winning-percentage was .415.
NEUTRAL-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-ins by the total number of attempted passes, dekes and dump-ins.
Subban had a neutral-zone possession success-rate of 100% in 25 games. In those games the Canadiens had an 11-14 record, and a winning-percentage of .440. In games where Subban's n-zone possession rating was above 80%, the Habs winning-percentage was .400.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-outs by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and dump-outs.
Subban had a defensive-zone possession success-rate above 80% in 21 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 6-15 record, and a winning-percentage of only .285. Inexplicably, in games where Subban's d-zone possession rating dropped below 70%, the Habs winning-percentage rose to .481.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. For defensemen, it is predominately a reflection of how successful a d-man is at pinching, or holding the puck in at the blueline.
Subban had an offensive-zone defensive success-rate of 100% in 31 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 16-15 record, and a respectable winning-percentage of .516. In games where Subban's o-zone defensive rating dropped below 80%, the Habs winning-percentage dropped to .241; possibly due to an increase in odd-man rushes.
NEUTRAL-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. The fact that the play is usually coming toward a defenseman in the neutral-zone, typically allows d-men to produce much higher n-zone defensive-ratings than forwards
Subban had a neutral-zone defensive success-rate of 100% in 39 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 14-25 record, and a winning-percentage of .359.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, intercepted opposition passes, and blocked shots by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, opportunities to intercept opposition passes, and opportunities to block shots.
Subban had a defensive-zone defensive success-rate above 80% in 14 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 6-8 record, and a winning-percentage of .429. In games where Subban's d-zone defensive rating dropped below 80%, the Habs winning-percentage was .444.
Among these 6 categories, Subban's offensive-zone defensive-rating proved to have the biggest impact on the Canadiens record. A dip in success-rate of 20% consequently dropped the Canadiens winning-percentage from .516 to just .241.
No comments:
Post a Comment