Total events tracked for Emelin: 3,590
Total even-strength minutes played: 1061.7
BELOW THE STATS AND RANKINGS I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED EACH PLAYER'S GAME BY GAME POSSESSION AND DEFENSIVE RATING, AS WELL AS THE IMPACT THEIR PERFORMANCE HAD ON THE TEAM'S WINNING-PERCENTAGE.
BELOW THAT IS HIS GAME BY GAME EVEN-STRENGTH, SHORT-HANDED, AND POWERPLAY ICE-TIME (GREEN INDICATES WIN, RED INDICATES LOSS)
OFFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
NEUTRAL-ZONE TENDENCIES
DEFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
POWERPLAY TENDENCIES
The charts below represent Emelin's statistics during the 2011-12 season. The first chart reflects his play in the offensive-zone, while the second chart represents his play in the defensive-zone.
The first column within each chart lists each category. The second column indicates his rating/ratio/success-rate/event per-minute within that category. The third column is the team average, while the fourth and fifth show his ranking among teammates. The first ranking is where he ranked among all 24 of his returning teammates, the second ranking is versus 8 returning defensemen (Kaberle, Gorges, Diaz, St. Denis, Weber, Emelin, Markov, Subban).
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Emelin ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- Offensive-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Success-rate when attempting to remove/acquire possession from opposition
Where Emelin ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- None
Where Emelin ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Offensive-zone ratio of successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play
- Offensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute played
- Offensive-zone events per-minute played
- Successful o-zone puck-possession plays per-minute
- Offensive-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Attempted o-zone passes per-minute
- Successful o-zone passes per-minute
- Offensive-zone passing success-rate
- Successful o-zone dekes per-minute played
- Shots through to the net per-minute played
- Shots through success-rate
- True shooting percentage (goals/attempted shots)
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 0.14 | 0.30 | 18 | 4 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 1.64 | 1.64 | 11 | 5 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.10 | 0.25 | 22 | 6 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 56.8% | 49.8% | 2 | 1 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 0.56 | 1.24 | 23 | 7 |
| FORECHECKING SUCCESS-RATE | 82.2% | 71.1% | 1 | 1 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (O-ZONE) | 0.049 | 0.062 | 15 | 3 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 0.16 | 0.42 | 23 | 7 |
| O-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 49.7% | 56.6% | 21 | 7 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.16 | 0.40 | 24 | 8 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.10 | 0.24 | 24 | 8 |
| O-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 62.9% | 60.7% | 10 | 6 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.02 | 0.13 | 19 | 4 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.01 | 0.07 | 20 | 5 |
| O-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 61.1% | 56.3% | 8 | 4 |
| ATTEMPTED SHOTS PER-MINUTE | 0.15 | 0.21 | 15 | 4 |
| SHOTS THROUGH TO THE NET PER-MINUTE | 0.05 | 0.10 | 19 | 5 |
| SHOTS THROUGH SUCCESS-RATE | 34.8% | 49.1% | 21 | 6 |
| TRUE SHOOTING-PERCENTAGE (GOALS / ATTEMPTED SHOTS) | 1.2% | 3.7% | 18 | 5 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 16.5 | 5.1 | ||
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Emelin ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- None
Where Emelin ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone deke success-rate
Where Emelin ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone risk/reward rating
- Defensive-zone ratio of successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play
- Defensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute played
- Defensive-zone events per-minute played
- Defensive success-rate in defensive-zone
- Intercepted opposition passes per-minute played
- Successful d-zone puck-possession plays per-minute played
- Defensive-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Attempted d-zone passes per-minute played
- Successful d-zone passes per-minute played
- Defensive-zone passing success-rate
- Attempted d-zone dekes per-minute played
- Attempted dump-outs per-minute played
- Successful dump-outs per-minute played
- Success-rate when attempting to dump the puck out of the defensive-zone
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 0.75 | 0.60 | 7 | 7 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 1.95 | 2.12 | 16 | 7 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.40 | 0.32 | 6 | 5 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 55.0% | 53.1% | 7 | 3 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 2.32 | 1.68 | 6 | 6 |
| DEFENDING IN D-ZONE SUCCESS-RATE | 64.8% | 68.3% | 20 | 7 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.091 | 0.086 | 6 | 6 |
| BLOCKED SHOTS PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.089 | 0.065 | 4 | 4 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 0.71 | 0.55 | 5 | 5 |
| D-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 67.6% | 67.5% | 8 | 6 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.91 | 0.64 | 6 | 6 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.63 | 0.19 | 8 | 8 |
| D-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 68.8% | 70.7% | 10 | 7 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.05 | 0.05 | 7 | 5 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.04 | 0.03 | 7 | 4 |
| D-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 71.4% | 57.0% | 2 | 2 |
| ATTEMPTED DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.08 | 0.11 | 20 | 6 |
| DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.05 | 0.07 | 20 | 6 |
| DUMP-OUTS SUCCESS-RATE | 58.6% | 65.0% | 19 | 7 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 9.7 | 5.6 | ||
The Montreal Canadiens ended the season with a .378 winning-percentage. Alexei Emelin played in 67 of those 82 games. The Habs winning-percentage with Emelin in the line-up was .343.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and shots that hit the net by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and passes.
Emelin had an offensive-zone possession success-rate above 70% in 11 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 3-8 record, and a winning-percentage of .272. When Emelin's o-zone possession rating fell below 60% Montreal's winning-percentage was .351.
NEUTRAL-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-ins by the total number of attempted passes, dekes and dump-ins.
Emelin had a neutral-zone possession success-rate of 100% in 15 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 6-9 record, and a winning-percentage of .400. In games where Emelin's n-zone possession rating dropped below 80%, the team's winning-percentage was .342.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-outs by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and dump-outs.
Emelin had a defensive-zone possession success-rate above 70% in 31 games. In those games the Canadiens had an 7-24 record, and a winning-percentage of .225. In games where Emelin's d-zone possession rating was above 60%, the Habs winning-percentage was .354.In games where this same success-rate dropped below 60%, Montreal's winning-percentage was .333.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. For defensemen, it is predominately a reflection of how successful a d-man is at pinching, or holding the puck in at the blueline.
Emelin had an offensive-zone defensive success-rate of 100% in 33 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 14-19 record, and a winning-percentage of .424. In games where Emelin's o-zone defensive rating dropped below 80%, the Habs winning-percentage dropped to .350; possibly due to an increase in odd-man rushes.
NEUTRAL-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. The fact that the play is usually coming toward a defenseman in the neutral-zone, typically allows d-men to produce much higher n-zone defensive-ratings than forwards
Emelin had a neutral-zone defensive success-rate of 100% in 31 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 8-23 record, and a winning-percentage of .258. When Emelin's success-rate fell below 70%, the Habs winning record was .400.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, intercepted opposition passes, and blocked shots by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, opportunities to intercept opposition passes, and opportunities to block shots.
Emelin had a defensive-zone defensive success-rate above 70% in 23 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 8-15 record, and a winning-percentage of .348. In games where Emelin's d-zone defensive rating dropped below 70%, the Habs winning-percentage was .341.
EVEN-STRENGTH ICE-TIME
The Habs were 2-4 (.333) when Emelin played more than 20 even-strength minutes. When he played less than 15 ES minutes in a game, Montreal was 8-15 (.348). The Canadiens were 8-10 (.444) when Emelin played between 15 and 17 minutes per-game at even-strength.
SHORT-HANDED ICE-TIME
Montreal had a 13-20 record .394 when Emelin played at least 1 short-handed minute in a game, and were 6-9 (.400) when he played more than 2 short-handed minutes.
POWERPLAY ICE-TIME
No comments:
Post a Comment