Total events tracked for Weber: 2,513
Total even-strength minutes played: 714.64
BELOW THE STATS AND RANKINGS I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED EACH PLAYER'S GAME BY GAME POSSESSION AND DEFENSIVE RATING, AS WELL AS THE IMPACT THEIR PERFORMANCE HAD ON THE TEAM'S WINNING-PERCENTAGE.
BELOW THAT IS HIS GAME BY GAME EVEN-STRENGTH, SHORT-HANDED, AND POWERPLAY ICE-TIME (GREEN INDICATES WIN, RED INDICATES LOSS)
OFFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
NEUTRAL-ZONE TENDENCIES
DEFENSIVE-ZONE TENDENCIES
POWERPLAY TENDENCIES
The charts below represent Weber's statistics during the 2011-12 season. The first chart reflects his play in the offensive-zone, while the second chart represents his play in the defensive-zone.
The first column within each chart lists each category. The second column indicates his rating/ratio/success-rate/event per-minute within that category. The third column is the team average, while the fourth and fifth show his ranking among teammates. The first ranking is where he ranked among all 24 of his returning teammates, the second ranking is versus 8 returning defensemen (Kaberle, Gorges, Diaz, St. Denis, Weber, Emelin, Markov, Subban).
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Weber ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- Attempted shots per-minute played
Where Weber ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- Offensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute played
Where Weber ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Offensive-zone risk/reward rating
- O-zone ratio of successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play
- Offensive-zone puck-battle winning-percentage
- Success-rate attempting to remove/acquire puck from opposition in offensive-zone
- Successful o-zone puck-possession plays per-minute played
- O-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Attempted o-zone passes per-minute played
- Successful o-zone passes per-minute played
- Attempted o-zone dekes per-minute played
- Successful o-zone dekes per-minute played
- O-zone deke success-rate
- Success-rate getting shots through to the net
- True shooting percentage (ES goals/attempted shots)
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 0.12 | 0.30 | 23 | 7 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 1.38 | 1.64 | 21 | 8 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.14 | 0.25 | 17 | 2 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 48.6% | 49.8% | 16 | 5 |
| OFFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 0.72 | 1.24 | 19 | 4 |
| FORECHECKING SUCCESS-RATE | 73.0% | 71.1% | 10 | 6 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (O-ZONE) | 0.048 | 0.062 | 19 | 4 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 0.19 | 0.42 | 21 | 6 |
| O-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 47.9% | 56.6% | 23 | 8 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.18 | 0.40 | 20 | 5 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.12 | 0.24 | 21 | 6 |
| O-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 66.7% | 60.7% | 5 | 4 |
| ATTEMPTED O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.010 | 0.13 | 21 | 6 |
| SUCCESSFUL O-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.003 | 0.07 | 24 | 8 |
| O-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 28.6% | 56.3% | 24 | 8 |
| ATTEMPTED SHOTS PER-MINUTE | 0.21 | 0.21 | 10 | 1 |
| SHOTS THROUGH TO THE NET PER-MINUTE | 0.07 | 0.10 | 17 | 3 |
| SHOTS THROUGH SUCCESS-RATE | 32.0% | 49.1% | 23 | 7 |
| TRUE SHOOTING-PERCENTAGE (GOALS / ATTEMPTED SHOTS) | 0.0% | 3.7% | 24 | 8 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 18.8 | 5.6 | ||
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
Where Weber ranked number 1 among fellow defensemen:
- None
Where Weber ranked number 2 among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone puck-battle winning percentage
Where Weber ranked low (5th to 8th) among fellow defensemen:
- Defensive-zone risk/reward rating
- Defensive-zone ratio of successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play
- Defensive-zone loose-puck recoveries per-minute
- Defensive-zone events per-minute played
- Defensive success-rate in defensive-zone
- Intercepted opposition passes in the d-zone per-minute played
- Blocked shots per-minute played
- D-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Attempted d-zone dekes per-minute played
- Successful d-zone dekes per-minute played
- D-zone deke success-rate
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE (EVEN-STRENGTH) | # | TEAM AVG. | RANK | RANK (DEFENSEMEN) |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING | 0.78 | 0.60 | 6 | 6 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS) | 2.01 | 2.12 | 14 | 6 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES PER-MINUTE | 0.38 | 0.32 | 7 | 6 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE | 60.9% | 53.1% | 3 | 2 |
| DEFENSIVE-ZONE EVENTS PER-MINUTE PLAYED | 2.33 | 1.68 | 5 | 5 |
| DEFENDING IN D-ZONE SUCCESS-RATE | 65.8% | 68.3% | 20 | 6 |
| INTERCEPTED OPPOSITION PASSES PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.080 | 0.086 | 11 | 8 |
| BLOCKED SHOTS PER-MINUTE (D-ZONE) | 0.071 | 0.065 | 6 | 6 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS PER MINUTE | 0.74 | 0.55 | 4 | 4 |
| D-ZONE PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE | 67.9% | 67.5% | 6 | 5 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.96 | 0.64 | 4 | 4 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE PASSES PER-MINUTE | 0.67 | 0.19 | 4 | 4 |
| D-ZONE PASSING SUCCESS-RATE | 70.1% | 70.7% | 8 | 5 |
| ATTEMPTED D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.03 | 0.05 | 12 | 6 |
| SUCCESSFUL D-ZONE DEKES PER-MINUTE | 0.01 | 0.03 | 14 | 7 |
| D-ZONE DEKE SUCCESS-RATE | 40.9% | 57.0% | 14 | 6 |
| ATTEMPTED DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.09 | 0.11 | 17 | 4 |
| DUMP-OUTS PER-MINUTE | 0.06 | 0.07 | 16 | 4 |
| DUMP-OUTS SUCCESS-RATE | 68.9% | 65.0% | 7 | 3 |
| AVERAGE RANKING | 9.4 | 5.1 | ||
The Montreal Canadiens ended the season with a .378 winning-percentage. Yannick Weber played in 60 of the 82 games. In games Weber played, the Habs winning-percentage was .350.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and shots that hit the net by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and passes.
Weber had an offensive-zone possession success-rate of at least 70% in 7 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 4-3 record, and a winning-percentage of .571. When Weber's o-zone possession rating fell below 60% Montreal's winning-percentage was .353.
NEUTRAL-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-ins by the total number of attempted passes, dekes and dump-ins.
Weber had a neutral-zone possession success-rate of 100% in 21 games. In those games the Canadiens had an 11-10 record, and a winning-percentage of .524. When Weber's n-zone possession success-rate dropped below 80%, the team's winning-percentage was .269.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone puck-possession success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes, dekes, and dump-outs by the total number of attempted shots, dekes and dump-outs.
Weber had a defensive-zone possession success-rate above 70% in 26 games. In those games the Canadiens had an 11-15 record, and a winning-percentage of .423. In games where Weber's d-zone possession rating dropped below 70%, the Habs winning-percentage was .333.
OFFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's offensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. For defensemen, it is predominately a reflection of how successful a d-man is at pinching, or holding the puck in at the blueline.
Weber had an offensive-zone defensive success-rate above 80% in 28 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 11-17 record, and a winning-percentage of .393. In games where Weber's o-zone defensive rating dropped below 80%, the Habs winning-percentage was .360.
NEUTRAL-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's neutral-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, and intercepted opposition passes by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, and opportunities to intercept opposition passes. The fact that the play is usually coming toward a defenseman in the neutral-zone, typically allows d-men to produce much higher n-zone defensive-ratings than forwards
Weber had a neutral-zone defensive success-rate of 100% in 30 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 9-21 record, and a winning-percentage of .300. When Weber's success-rate fell below 60%, the Habs winning record was .444.
DEFENSIVE-ZONE DEFENSIVE SUCCESS-RATE BY GAME
A player's defensive-zone defensive success-rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful puck-battles, loose-puck recoveries, intercepted opposition passes, and blocked shots by the total number of puck-battles, loose-puck recovery attempts, opportunities to intercept opposition passes, and opportunities to block shots.
Weber had a defensive-zone defensive success-rate above 70% in 21 games. In those games the Canadiens had a 10-11 record, and a winning-percentage of .476. In games Weber's d-zone defensive rating dropped below 70%, the Habs winning-percentage was .324.
Weber's offensive and neutral-zone possession success-rates proved to have the biggest impact on the Canadiens record. A dip in success-rate of 10% in o-zone possession success dropped the Canadiens winning-percentage from .571 to just .333. A drop in neutral-zone possession success-rate of 20% dropped Montreal's winning-percentage from .524 to .269.
EVEN-STRENGTH ICE-TIME
In games where Weber played over 15 minutes at even-strength, the Canadiens had a 6-6 record (.500). When he played under 10 minutes at ES, the Habs were 4-9 (.444). Montreal was 12-16 (.429) when Weber played between 10 and 15 minutes at even-strength.
SHORT-HANDED ICE-TIME
The Habs were 8-10 (.444) when Weber played at least 1 minute short-handed.
POWERPLAY ICE-TIME
Montreal had a 12-21 (.364) record when Weber played at least 2 minutes on the powerplay.
Montreal was 3-6 (.333) when Gorges had at least 1 minute of powerplay ice-time.









No comments:
Post a Comment