Exclusive 2012-13 season data for Montreal Canadiens defensemen:
#22 Tomas Kaberle
#26 Josh Gorges
#40 Nathan Beaulieu
#42 Jarred Tinordi
#44 Davis Drewiske
#55 Francis Bouillon
#61 Raphael Diaz
#74 Alexei Emelin
#76 PK Subban
#79 Andrei Markov
I have only included those defensemen with at least 90 minutes of total ice-time.
Click on a player's name above to see more detail; including puck-possession trends by zone
RATINGS AND RATIOS
- PK Subban had the top overall ratio and risk/reward rating
- Jarred Tinordi had the lowest overall ratio and risk/reward rating, as he did not see any PP ice-time
- Subban had the best even-strength risk/reward rating (by far)
- Josh Gorges had the best even-strength ratio
- Raphael Diaz had the top PP ratio (among d-men with substantial PP time)
- Diaz had the top SH ratio (among d-men with substantial SH time)
- Gorges had the best takeaway to turnover ratio
- Nathan Beaulieu had the lowest takeaway to turnover ratio
- Beaulieu had the top scoring chance for/against ratio (slightly ahead of Subban)
- Tomas Kaberle had the lowest scoring chance for/against ratio
RATINGS
AND RATIOS
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
20.12
|
17.29
|
22.14
|
13.05
|
13.81
|
13.56
|
19.46
|
21.87
|
15.28
|
21.74
|
21.02
| |
OVERALL RATIO
|
3.17
|
3.29
|
3.26
|
2.31
|
2.53
|
2.41
|
3.23
|
3.41
|
2.80
|
3.47
|
3.30
|
OVERALL
RISK/REWARD RATING
|
2.04
|
2.17
|
1.80
|
1.57
|
1.91
|
1.57
|
1.89
|
2.16
|
1.64
|
2.64
|
2.20
|
ES RISK/REWARD
RATING
|
1.85
|
1.84
|
1.86
|
1.46
|
1.64
|
1.51
|
1.79
|
1.86
|
1.63
|
2.30
|
1.83
|
ES RATIO
|
2.76
|
2.62
|
3.04
|
2.05
|
2.24
|
2.17
|
2.95
|
2.79
|
2.59
|
3.00
|
2.66
|
PP RATIO
|
4.47
|
5.00
|
6.17
|
N/A
|
2.76
|
N/A
|
4.18
|
4.96
|
1.25
|
4.66
|
4.40
|
SH RATIO
|
2.64
|
N/A
|
2.51
|
2.80
|
N/A
|
2.86
|
2.21
|
3.61
|
2.04
|
2.26
|
3.53
|
TAKEAWAY TO
TURNOVER RATIO (HIGHER IS BETTER)
|
2.64
|
2.21
|
3.02
|
2.58
|
1.73
|
2.35
|
2.53
|
2.74
|
2.93
|
2.43
|
2.63
|
SCORING
CHANCE FOR/AGAINST RATIO (HIGHER IS BETTER)
|
0.56
|
0.17
|
0.48
|
0.27
|
1.00
|
0.69
|
0.69
|
0.34
|
0.40
|
0.98
|
0.47
|
SCORING CHANCE NUMBERS
|
DMEN
2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
SCORING CHANCE DATA
- Subban helped produce the most even-strength scoirng chances; followed by Markov
- Beaulieu helped produce the most even-strength scoring chances per minute of ice-time
- Subban helped produce the most ES scoring chances per minute among players with substantial playing time
- Kaberle helped produce the fewest scoring chances for per-minute of ice time
- Markov was partly responsibile for the most scoring chances against
- Tinordi was partly responsible for the most ES scoring chances against per-minute of ice-time
- Markov was partly responsible for the most ES chances against among players with substantial ice-time
SCORING
CHANCE NUMBERS
| |||||||||||
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
SCORING
CHANCES FOR
|
228
|
2
|
30
|
3
|
10
|
9
|
33
|
11
|
27
|
58
|
41
|
SCORING CHANCES FOR/ MP
|
0.053
|
0.023
|
0.038
|
0.040
|
0.127
|
0.069
|
0.047
|
0.032
|
0.045
|
0.087
|
0.054
|
CHANCES AGAINST
|
409
|
12
|
63
|
11
|
10
|
13
|
48
|
32
|
67
|
59
|
87
|
SCORING
CHANCES AGAINST/MP
|
0.095
|
0.138
|
0.079
|
0.146
|
0.127
|
0.100
|
0.069
|
0.094
|
0.112
|
0.089
|
0.114
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE DATA
- Tinordi won the most offensive-zone puck-battles per-minute played
- Markov won the most o-zone puck-battles per-minute among d-men with substantail minutes played
- Subban had the highest offensive-zone risk/reward rating and ratio
- Tinordi had the lowest offensive-zone risk/reward rating and ratio
- Gorges had the lowest o-zone risk/reward and ratio among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Subban recovered the most offensive-zone loose-pucks per-minute played
- Tinordi recovered the fewest offensive-zone loose-pucks per-minute played
- Francis Bouillon recovered the fewest o-zone loose-pucks among d-men with substantial ice-time
- Kaberle and Gorges had the top o-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Beaulieu and Drewiske had the lowest o-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Subban was involved in the most offensive-zone events per-minute played
- Drewiske was involved in the fewest offensive-zone events per-minute played
- Beaulieu had the best forechecking success-rate
- Tinordi had the lowest forechecking success-rate
- Tinordi intercepted the most opposition passes/dump-outs per-minute played (o-zone)
- Beaulieu intercepted the fewest opposition passes/dump-outs per-minute played (o-zone)
- Subban produced the most successful offensive-zone puck-possession plays per-minute played
- Among d-men with substantial minutes played, Gorges produced the fewest successful puck-possession plays in the o-zone per-minute played
- Subban had the top offensive-zone puck-possesssion success-rate
- Among d-men with substantial minutes, Gorges had the lowest offensive-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Bouillon produced the top offensive-zone passing success-rate
- Gorges produced the lowest o-zone passing success-rate
- Emelin produced the top offensive-zone deking success-rate
- Kaberle produced the lowest o-zone deking success-rate
- Subban was able to get the highest percentage of his attempted shots through to the net.
- Among d-men with substantial minutes played, Markov and Bouillon produced the lowest success-rate when attempting to get shots through to the net
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
(EVEN-STRENGTH)
| |||||||||||
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
SUCCESSFUL
OFFENSIVE-ZONE PUCK/BATTLES PER-MINUTE
|
0.02
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
0.07
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.03
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
RISK/REWARD RATING
|
0.22
|
0.20
|
0.13
|
0.00
|
0.23
|
0.08
|
0.24
|
0.18
|
0.18
|
0.39
|
0.30
|
O-ZONE
RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS)
|
1.78
|
1.55
|
1.50
|
1.00
|
1.75
|
1.30
|
2.01
|
1.72
|
1.66
|
2.18
|
2.00
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES
|
0.189
|
0.230
|
0.169
|
0.133
|
0.204
|
0.138
|
0.162
|
0.164
|
0.171
|
0.238
|
0.231
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE
|
84.5%
|
100.0%
|
96.0%
|
83.3%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
92.9%
|
75.0%
|
81.3%
|
81.3%
|
83.3%
|
OFFENSIVE-ZONE
EVENTS / MP
|
0.800
|
0.909
|
0.673
|
1.009
|
0.841
|
0.584
|
0.727
|
0.685
|
0.739
|
1.060
|
0.895
|
FORECHECKING
SUCCESS-RATE
|
76.6%
|
77.1%
|
78.3%
|
52.6%
|
81.8%
|
81.5%
|
81.3%
|
70.5%
|
76.6%
|
77.1%
|
76.8%
|
INTERCEPTED
OPPOSITION PASSES /MP
|
0.042
|
0.035
|
0.028
|
0.066
|
0.025
|
0.031
|
0.032
|
0.035
|
0.054
|
0.047
|
0.060
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
SUCCESSFUL
O-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS /MP
|
0.257
|
0.242
|
0.174
|
0.239
|
0.306
|
0.161
|
0.273
|
0.217
|
0.214
|
0.421
|
0.277
|
O-ZONE
PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE
|
56.1%
|
48.8%
|
46.6%
|
48.6%
|
57.1%
|
44.7%
|
59.4%
|
58.3%
|
52.2%
|
64.2%
|
58.9%
|
DEFLECTIONS/MP
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
O-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
0.265
|
0.322
|
0.238
|
0.305
|
0.306
|
0.154
|
0.287
|
0.217
|
0.219
|
0.308
|
0.313
|
SUCCESSFUL
O-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
0.176
|
0.184
|
0.127
|
0.186
|
0.204
|
0.092
|
0.215
|
0.152
|
0.147
|
0.210
|
0.218
|
O-ZONE
PASSING SUCCESS-RATE
|
66.4%
|
57.1%
|
53.4%
|
60.9%
|
66.7%
|
60.0%
|
75.0%
|
70.3%
|
67.2%
|
68.3%
|
69.7%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
O-ZONE DEKES /MP
|
0.038
|
0.046
|
0.004
|
0.000
|
0.076
|
0.008
|
0.020
|
0.015
|
0.010
|
0.158
|
0.018
|
SUCCESSFUL
O-ZONE DEKES /MP
|
0.026
|
0.012
|
0.001
|
0.000
|
0.051
|
0.000
|
0.009
|
0.009
|
0.008
|
0.120
|
0.014
|
O-ZONE DEKE
SUCCESS-RATE
|
68.1%
|
25.0%
|
33.3%
|
#DIV/0!
|
66.7%
|
0.0%
|
42.9%
|
60.0%
|
83.3%
|
76.2%
|
78.6%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
SHOTS /MP
|
0.157
|
0.127
|
0.131
|
0.186
|
0.153
|
0.200
|
0.152
|
0.140
|
0.181
|
0.189
|
0.139
|
SHOTS THROUGH
TO THE NET /MP
|
0.056
|
0.046
|
0.045
|
0.053
|
0.051
|
0.069
|
0.049
|
0.056
|
0.059
|
0.090
|
0.045
|
SHOTS THROUGH
SUCCESS-RATE
|
35.7%
|
36.4%
|
34.6%
|
28.6%
|
33.3%
|
34.6%
|
32.1%
|
39.6%
|
32.4%
|
47.6%
|
32.1%
|
TRUE
SHOOTING-% (GOALS / ATTEMPTED SHOTS)
|
1.8%
|
0.0%
|
1.9%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
3.8%
|
0.9%
|
2.1%
|
1.9%
|
2.4%
|
1.9%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE DATA
- Subban has the best defensive-zone risk/reward rating
- Drewiske had the losest defensive-zone risk/reward rating
- Gorges has the best defensive-zone ratio
- Drewiske had the lowest defensive-zone ratio
- Tinordi recovered the most defensive-zone loose-pucks
- Subban recovered the most defensive-zone loose-pucks among players with substantial minutes played
- Kaberle recovered the fewest defensive-zone loose-pucks per-minute played
- Gorges had the highest defensive-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Beaulieu had the lowest defensive-zone puck-battle winning percentage
- Subban engaged in the most defensive-zone events per-minute played
- Emelin engaged in the fewest defensive-zone events per-minute played
- Gorges had the best defensive-zone defending success-rate
- Drewiske had the lowest defensive-zone defending success-rate
- Markov intercepted the most opposition passes in the defensive-zone per-minute played
- Diaz intercepted the fewest opposition passes in the d-zone per-minute played
- Gorges blocked the most shots per-minute played
- Beaulieu blocked the fewest shots per-minute played
- Among d-men with substantial minutes, Subban had the highest defensive-zone puck-possession success-rate
- Among d-men with substantial minutes, Gorges had the top defensive-zone passing success-rate
- Among d-men with substantial minutes, Subban had the top defensive-zone deking success-rate
- Diaz had the top success-rate when attempting to dump the puck out of the defensive-zone
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
(EVEN-STRENGTH)
| |||||||||||
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
RISK/REWARD RATING
|
1.31
|
1.39
|
1.43
|
1.17
|
1.06
|
1.02
|
1.28
|
1.41
|
1.16
|
1.58
|
1.18
|
D-ZONE
RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS)
|
3.00
|
3.42
|
3.53
|
2.49
|
2.17
|
2.15
|
3.19
|
3.03
|
2.83
|
3.22
|
2.72
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES /MP
|
0.633
|
0.506
|
0.603
|
0.730
|
0.714
|
0.622
|
0.619
|
0.673
|
0.588
|
0.728
|
0.621
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE
|
78.4%
|
63.2%
|
84.2%
|
76.2%
|
62.5%
|
75.0%
|
78.3%
|
75.5%
|
76.2%
|
80.1%
|
77.5%
|
DEFENSIVE-ZONE
EVENTS /MP
|
2.63
|
2.54
|
2.56
|
2.73
|
2.87
|
2.80
|
2.45
|
2.80
|
2.43
|
3.00
|
2.55
|
DEFENDING IN
D-ZONE SUCCESS-RATE
|
77.4%
|
72.8%
|
80.6%
|
74.1%
|
70.8%
|
69.3%
|
79.7%
|
77.3%
|
75.5%
|
77.1%
|
78.0%
|
INTERCEPTED
OPPOSITION PASSES /MP
|
0.076
|
0.127
|
0.084
|
0.066
|
0.076
|
0.069
|
0.072
|
0.064
|
0.069
|
0.068
|
0.088
|
BLOCKED SHOTS
/MP
|
0.080
|
0.092
|
0.123
|
0.093
|
0.038
|
0.092
|
0.057
|
0.114
|
0.070
|
0.057
|
0.067
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
D-ZONE
PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE
|
72.6%
|
81.4%
|
75.0%
|
68.1%
|
66.4%
|
66.9%
|
72.8%
|
73.0%
|
72.1%
|
75.7%
|
68.2%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
D-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
1.074
|
1.208
|
1.018
|
0.982
|
1.223
|
1.068
|
1.099
|
1.215
|
0.931
|
1.177
|
1.039
|
SUCCESSFUL
D-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
0.805
|
1.001
|
0.801
|
0.690
|
0.854
|
0.738
|
0.820
|
0.896
|
0.707
|
0.916
|
0.730
|
D-ZONE
PASSING SUCCESS-RATE
|
75.0%
|
82.9%
|
78.7%
|
70.3%
|
69.8%
|
69.1%
|
74.6%
|
73.7%
|
75.9%
|
77.8%
|
70.3%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
D-ZONE DEKES /MP
|
0.072
|
0.058
|
0.042
|
0.093
|
0.140
|
0.123
|
0.052
|
0.061
|
0.047
|
0.173
|
0.038
|
SUCCESSFUL
D-ZONE DEKES /MP
|
0.048
|
0.058
|
0.020
|
0.066
|
0.089
|
0.069
|
0.032
|
0.044
|
0.023
|
0.135
|
0.024
|
D-ZONE DEKE
SUCCESS-RATE
|
67.3%
|
100.0%
|
48.5%
|
71.4%
|
63.6%
|
56.3%
|
61.1%
|
71.4%
|
50.0%
|
78.3%
|
62.1%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
DUMP-OUTS /MP
|
0.156
|
0.092
|
0.141
|
0.146
|
0.115
|
0.069
|
0.103
|
0.126
|
0.149
|
0.251
|
0.188
|
DUMP-OUTS /MP
|
0.099
|
0.046
|
0.084
|
0.093
|
0.064
|
0.046
|
0.066
|
0.091
|
0.089
|
0.168
|
0.116
|
DUMP-OUTS
SUCCESS-RATE
|
63.3%
|
50.0%
|
59.8%
|
63.6%
|
55.6%
|
66.7%
|
63.9%
|
72.1%
|
59.6%
|
67.1%
|
61.5%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE DATA
- Drewiske had the highest neutral-zone risk/reward rating
- Markov had the highest n-zone risk/reward rating among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Kaberle had the lowest n-zone risk/reward rating
- Gorges has the highest neutral-zone ratio
- Kaberle had the lowest n-zone ratio
- Drewiske recovered the most neutral-zone loose-pucks per-minute played
- Markov recovered the most neutral-zone loose-pucks among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Beaulieu and Tinordi had the highest n-zone puck-battle winning-percentage
- Gorges had the highest n-zone puck-battle winnning-percentage among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Drewiske engaged in the most neutral-zone events per-minute played
- Markov engaged in the most n-zone events per-minute played among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Drewiske had the top neutral-zone defending success-rate
- Gorges had the top n-zone defending success-rate among d-men with substantial minutes played
- Markov intercepted the most opposition passes in the neutral-zone per-minutes played
- Beaulieu produced the most successful n-zone puck-possession plays per-minute played
- Among d-men with substantial minutes, Subban produced the most successful n-zone puck-possession plays per-minute played
- Subban had the top neutral-zone passing success-rate
- Among players with substantial minutes, Bouillon had the top neutral-zone deking success-rate
- Diaz had the top success-rate when attempting to dump the puck deep into the offensive-zone
NEUTRAL-ZONE
(EVEN-STRENGTH)
| |||||||||||
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
NEUTRAL-ZONE
RISK/REWARD RATING
|
0.31
|
0.25
|
0.30
|
0.29
|
0.36
|
0.41
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.29
|
0.33
|
0.35
|
N-ZONE
RATIO (SUCCESSFUL TO UNSUCCESSFUL PLAYS)
|
4.00
|
2.22
|
4.92
|
3.75
|
4.11
|
3.94
|
3.88
|
4.03
|
3.51
|
4.21
|
3.96
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE
LOOSE-PUCK RECOVERIES/MP
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.09
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
0.16
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.13
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE
PUCK-BATTLE WINNING-PERCENTAGE
|
85.7%
|
80.0%
|
91.4%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
86.7%
|
78.6%
|
82.8%
|
78.6%
|
82.8%
|
NEUTRAL-ZONE
EVENTS /MP
|
0.514
|
0.667
|
0.447
|
0.505
|
0.586
|
0.684
|
0.455
|
0.442
|
0.521
|
0.532
|
0.592
|
DEFENDING IN
N-ZONE SUCCESS-RATE
|
86.5%
|
83.3%
|
93.9%
|
81.3%
|
81.8%
|
94.3%
|
86.0%
|
82.7%
|
80.7%
|
87.8%
|
84.5%
|
INTERCEPTED
OPPOSITION PASSES /MP
|
0.026
|
0.023
|
0.028
|
0.013
|
0.025
|
0.023
|
0.026
|
0.012
|
0.023
|
0.014
|
0.043
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
SUCCESSFUL
N-ZONE PUCK POSSESSION PLAYS
|
0.248
|
0.288
|
0.217
|
0.226
|
0.357
|
0.292
|
0.238
|
0.228
|
0.245
|
0.301
|
0.236
|
N-ZONE
PUCK-POSSESSION SUCCESS-RATE
|
76.2%
|
62.5%
|
76.8%
|
77.3%
|
80.0%
|
70.4%
|
76.5%
|
78.8%
|
76.0%
|
78.1%
|
75.6%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
N-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
0.182
|
0.230
|
0.123
|
0.212
|
0.204
|
0.254
|
0.168
|
0.149
|
0.201
|
0.168
|
0.239
|
SUCCESSFUL
N-ZONE PASSES /MP
|
0.138
|
0.161
|
0.092
|
0.159
|
0.153
|
0.169
|
0.132
|
0.108
|
0.152
|
0.144
|
0.177
|
N-ZONE
PASSING SUCCESS-RATE
|
76.0%
|
70.0%
|
74.5%
|
75.0%
|
75.0%
|
66.7%
|
78.6%
|
72.5%
|
75.8%
|
85.7%
|
74.2%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
N-ZONE DEKES/MP
|
0.018
|
0.012
|
0.006
|
0.013
|
0.064
|
0.015
|
0.009
|
0.015
|
0.007
|
0.059
|
0.011
|
SUCCESSFUL
N-ZONE DEKES /MP
|
0.013
|
0.012
|
0.004
|
0.013
|
0.025
|
0.015
|
0.007
|
0.009
|
0.003
|
0.048
|
0.008
|
N-ZONE DEKE
SUCCESS-RATE
|
75.0%
|
100.0%
|
60.0%
|
100.0%
|
40.0%
|
100.0%
|
83.3%
|
60.0%
|
50.0%
|
82.1%
|
75.0%
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
| |
ATTEMPTED
DUMP-INS/MP
|
0.123
|
0.207
|
0.149
|
0.066
|
0.178
|
0.146
|
0.134
|
0.126
|
0.109
|
0.153
|
0.062
|
SUCCESSFUL
DUMP-INS/MP
|
0.096
|
0.115
|
0.121
|
0.053
|
0.178
|
0.108
|
0.099
|
0.111
|
0.089
|
0.108
|
0.051
|
DUMP-INS
SUCCESS-RATE
|
78.3%
|
55.6%
|
81.4%
|
80.0%
|
100.0%
|
73.7%
|
74.2%
|
88.4%
|
81.5%
|
70.6%
|
83.0%
|
OFFSIDES
CAUSED
|
5
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
DMEN 2012-13
|
22
|
26
|
42
|
40
|
44
|
55
|
61
|
74
|
76
|
79
|
